Dear Paradoxy,

I have obviously acknowledged that good women exist. See how easily you twist my words and assume the wrong meaning?

I am absolutely not twisting your words. I said that you see good women as an exception to the rule. And you confirmed it. You said that 93% of the women you met were bad (“based on the countless number of people that I have met, the ratio of bad women to good is like 93:100″).

And that’s misogyny. Because you extrapolate your experience to a wider population and believe that indeed, the large majority of women is immoral. And btw, our personal experience is very subjective, which means that some of the women you met and didn’t like might have indeed been immoral. While some other (such as your school friend) might have been good, caring people, but you saw them as bad.

You actually said an extraordinary thing:

I have realized that even though she has done a lot of stupid things, she is still 100000x better than most of the other women that I have met.

So B – who was lying to you, cheating on you, and even prostituted herself behind your back – appeared to you as 100 thousand times better than most other women you met. Well, if you believe that a woman of a pretty low morale is still much better than 93% of the women out there, it shows that your view of women is pretty distorted. And unfortunately, it shows that you despise women.

Here is your definition of entitled feminist women:

Women who think they are equal to men and capable of doing whatever they want

In what sense equal to men? You mean these feminists seek to have an equal say in the marriage?

When you say “doing whatever they want”, do you mean they shouldn’t be allowed to cheat on their husbands? Or perhaps you mean they shouldn’t be allowed to pursue a career they prefer?

So what exactly are they doing, which shouldn’t be allowed?