Dear ConfusedinCali:

You are welcome. According to the information you added, that CW1 is the indirect supervisor of CW2- it makes sense to me that (unless what CW2 did was horrific and presented a real and present danger to other people) CW1 should have suggested to CW2 to correct the particular behavior or practice instead of approaching the direct supervisor. Only if CW2 did not correct what she needed to correct, then it would  make sense to involve the direct supervisor.

anita