How time flies… a moment in time and the timelessness beneath it… Thanks Anita – I needed that reminder today… and so a
Reflection on a Reflection as remembering.

A moment in time, and the timelessness beneath it… Do you see it? Do you see what we’ve been circling?

There is nothing to believe here. No theology, no dogma, no apologetics. No need to stretch the mind around it.

It feels like a breath lighter than air, a quiet remembrance that was never really lost… And perhaps I needed that today. Because today, the world feels like it’s moving past me. Or maybe it’s just the old feeling of being carried along by the painting… caught again in the motion of what appears.

So, I close my eyes. And there… Yes.. not as answer, but a softening.

I see the wisdom traditions dancing along the surface of the canvas. Each one tracing its own patterns, its own shapes, its own language, and yet all of them, somehow, pointing back without quite naming it. Pointing without pointing… But only when we remember…

Love seems to bring us closer, a dissolving of distance… And fear… fear loses contact creating so much distance. It tightens around the image, the form, the story, mistaking what is painted for what allows the painting.

It is so easy to forget. To take the picture as the source. To cling to the colors and call them reality. To argue over shapes, while the canvas quietly remains untouched… My heart breaks… fear choosing form when form forgets? And yet, even here, something shifts.

Do you see the subtle leap? The place where even these words begin to falter. Where “canvas” and “painting” are still distinctions the mind creates. There comes a point where even these must be released, no longer needed.

The space between canvas and painting was never really there, a space where nothing needs to be held at all.

Hi Anita,
I have to laugh at myself a little.. and maybe cry a little to… I made my last message far too complicated! My own mind got caught up in the “analysis”. Excited about the depth of a metaphor that I tried to build a cathedral when a simple window would have done the trick.

To put it simply: I was just wondering if you noticed that the moment the mind asks, “Where did the peace go?”, the question itself is what creates the distance, and ‘loss of peace’. It’s like the fingers going up in peek-a-boo. The peace hasn’t actually left; the question just momentarily hides it.

You put it so beautifully when you said the aloneness was just “fingers covering my sky-face.” That’s it, exactly. Whether the fingers are a “why” question, a overly complicated metaphor or an old memory of your mother, they don’t change the sky behind them.

Anatta. 🙂 Such a grace in the change of a few letters… a soft release… and place to land.

You asked, “If it’s real (the territory), why doesn’t it last? Why doesn’t it override the map?”

Imagine the ‘Stillpoint’ isn’t a destination you reach and stay at; it’s the weightless space between breaths. I imagine that Spark as a point rising into the air, pure and formless. Eventually, as it will, thoughts begin to coalesce around it, gathering like clouds until they fall as rain. (vice hail of a hardened heart)

That rain is necessary! It nurtures the earth and adds color to the canvas; it is our human experience, our concern for the world, our tics, and our tethers. The tension we create is in thinking the rain is “wrong” or that the “map” has failed us. Maps have their uses…

When we get scared about the news, the “map” of fear appears. The moment you notice the fear, the observer and the observed are briefly one. But then, the mind separates them again and asks, “Why did the peace go away?” (is it irony that the answer is the question? a thought to sit with… 🙂 )

And at that moment, the Buddha (No-Self) smiles. Why? Because the next breath is already rising. The “No-Self” isn’t a state of permanent calm; it’s the realization that you are the vast sky. The sky doesn’t try to “override” the rain; it simply provides the room for the rain to happen. (and not become hail)

I don’t feel we are meant to “solve” the frenzy, such doing could only create more form, more frenzy. Instead we remember we are the wide, open space where even the most frantic thinking eventually finds its way home to rest.

So when the “solving-frenzy” starts up again, as it will, can you see it as just a passing summer storm in the sky of Anatta, knowing the sky itself remains untouched?

I will be away from the computer for a while, time to sit under a tree… Peter

Anita, happy to have read that you ‘detected’ the joke!

Your breakdown of the Knots and Double Binds is incredibly clear. What did you think of Laing? He was criticized and belittled for his work but today is starting to be recognized.

I noticed what you said about the ‘No-Self.’ In Buddhism, the term ‘No-Self’ carries a heavy, positive spiritual weight, which as a child wasn’t your experience of that term. You mentioned before how the teaching of ‘No-Self’ has triggered you. I wonder if you see it today as a ‘knot’ to untie?

Every child experiences this to some degree, and sadly, many adults pass it on without realizing it, even sadder some have mastered it as a tool for personal gain. For me, working to untie these knots and mystifications has made me more likely to notice them when I encounter them… or when I am about to create them myself.

When we see how the ‘fog’ is made, we become harder to mystify. We start to notice the drenching before it freezes us. We move from the past realization into a present vigilance. So today when you see that same ‘shaming look’ or ‘scrambled logic’ directed at yourself or onto others out in the world today, does seeing these patterns help you ‘trust your gut’ more?

Hi Anita,
You asked about Calvinism… Calvinism: Where the joy of being predestined is matched only by the intense, sober pressure of making sure you look like you deserve it. 🙂 🙁 In a way, it’s a similar early mystification of ‘self’ to what you experienced.

Thank you for sharing the story about your notebook of poems. It’s a heartbreakingly clear image: the teenager reaching out in a poem, only to be met with a ‘hardened heart’ instead of a hand. That look of shaming condemnation is exactly how the ‘hailstone’ causes damage… it breaks the very things it was supposed to nourish.

When you say S.H.A.M.E. was her legacy, it strikes me that shame is often the ‘freezing’ agent. It’s what forces our fluid, creative selves to go into hiding.

My experience with Calvinism was the ultimate R.D. Laing double-bind: I was told my status was eternally settled by a sovereign decree, yet I spent every day in a self-conscious performance to prove I wasn’t an impostor. It turns ‘assurance’ into a very quiet, very disciplined kind of ‘madness.’

I’ve actually been thinking about this specific ‘hardening’ process this morning through Laing’s lens. He had a term for what you experienced: ‘Mystification.’ It’s what happens when our internal compass is intentionally scrambled by the people who were supposed to help us read it. I was just about to share these thoughts on how the ‘False Self’ is formed as a survival tactic…

From Droplets to Hail: A Reflection on R.D. Laing
In our modern world, many of us feel a growing sense of unease. We watch the news or look at leaders and sense a ‘fog’… a confusing layer of justifications that seem to trample over simple human truth. We see people who once seemed kind become rigid, their hearts ‘hardening’ until they seem unrecognizable.

If we look through the lens of psychiatrist R.D. Laing, we find a sobering explanation. His work suggests that our ‘hailstones’ are actually quite predictable:
– The Particle (The Spark): This is the core of the individual—the ‘True Self’ or Imago Dei.
– The Droplet (The Form): We all need a ‘form’ (language, culture, or religion) to carry our spark into the world. Rain is life-giving.
– The Atmosphere (The Environment): If the air is filled with fear, control, or ‘might-makes-right’ ideologies, the droplet is forced upward into the freezing ‘cold’ of abstraction and defensiveness.
– The Hail (The Petrified Self): The droplet freezes. It is still made of ‘water,’ but it has lost its fluidity. It is hard and heavy. When it falls, it no longer nourishes the earth; it breaks things.

This ‘hardened heart’ becomes a Divided Self. We create a ‘False Self’ to act out the scripts of a Cause or a Religion, burying the ‘True Self’ so deep that we eventually lose access to it entirely.

For me, this explains the ‘Pharaohs’ of today. Those who act without the friction of conscience aren’t born as monsters; they are victims of a process where the ‘hard heart’ became a permanent armor. They’ve become shells for the ideologies that consumed them.

Understanding this doesn’t mean we excuse the ‘hail’ when it falls. Rather, it helps us protect our own fluidity. By recognizing the ‘knots’ and double-binds of the world, we can choose to stay as rain to remain soft, even when the atmosphere around us is freezing.

As I’ve explored this topic I find my self continually surprised of how the literalism we internalize as children can eventually feel like a cage. As I discussed with Roberta to find a way out, I’ve found I often have to look toward other wisdom traditions, not to abandon my home, but to find the tools to renovate it. Here is a less biblical example warning of a hardened heart…

I’ve been reflecting on a verse from the Tao Te Ching:

The Way bears one. The one bears two. The two bear three. The three bear the ten thousand things. The ten thousand things carry the yin on their shoulders and hold in their arms the yang, whose interplay of energy makes harmony.
People despise orphans, widowers, outcasts. Yet that’s what kings and rulers call themselves. Whatever you lose, you’ve won. Whatever you win, you’ve lost. What others teach, I say too: violence and aggression destroy themselves. My teaching rests on that

Lao Tzu suggests that we often become caught in the dualisms of winning and losing, subject and object. Again and again, experience seems to split itself into opposites. Yet this cosmology gestures toward something prior to this division, something like the “Law of Three,” where a third presence opens a space for a choiceless choice. It is the moment that is neither inhale, exhale nor holding, a weightless pause where the creative spark arises.

From there, something subtle happens. The spark does not remain formless. Language gathers around it, as moisture gathers in the air. At first, it is light, like vapor, invisible and unbound. Then, almost imperceptibly, it condenses. A thought takes shape, an image forms, and the first raindrop appears. This is natural, even necessary: the formless becoming form, the unseen becoming speakable. Like rain, it nourishes, it connects, it allows life to take root.

But the process does not always stop at rain.

Under certain conditions, when the atmosphere grows turbulent, when currents clash and intensify, the raindrop is carried upward again. It passes through layers of freezing air, and each pass adds another shell. What began as a simple condensation becomes a hailstone: solid, dense, and weighty.

So too with our thoughts. A simple insight, once named, can be lifted back into the churn of reaction, defensiveness, and repetition, until it hardens into a fixed position. This is the “hardened heart” from the old stories, not a divine punishment, but a psychological process where a living truth becomes an icy weapon. What began as a living spark becomes something we grasp, defend, and eventually throw.

In this metaphor, the “One” is the open atmosphere, pure, unformed potential. The “Two” is the condensation, the inevitable forming of a drop. But the hailstone is a distortion: it is form that has been cycled through resistance until it forgets its origin in lightness. By the time we hold a rigid stance, we are no longer holding rain, but ice.

Today, I want to practice what the older Christian traditions called Perichoresis, the “divine dance.” This wasn’t a dry doctrine but a description of mutual indwelling and dynamic movement. It echoes Lao Tzu’s harmony: the One becoming Two, and the Two finding their rhythm in the Three.

Through this lens, the tensions in my own life begin to soften. My active drive to achieve and my passive need to rest are no longer adversaries; they are movements within a larger rhythm. The “third force” is not something added, but something noticed, the breath itself, the living space between.

I saw this briefly this morning in a difficult conversation. There was the impulse to defend, to solidify into a position. There was also the impulse to withdraw. But for a moment, there was a gap. In that space, nothing had yet hardened. It was a moment where I did not have to become the hailstone; I could remain as the atmosphere.

Violence, I see now, is a forgetting of this movement. It is what happens when we try to give permanence to what was never meant to be fixed, so begets and destroys it self. But the Tao suggests a reversal: what is yielded is not lost. By releasing the weight of needing to be “right,” we return to the dance.

The world often operates as if only hailstones are real, solid positions and force meeting force. But beneath the noise, the quieter process continues: the forming and dissolving, the rising and falling.

So today, I will look for that movement in small things. I will notice the instant before the drop hardens. I will allow the spark to remain light a little longer. In that openness, there is finally room to breathe.

I also wanted to share a bit more about my original intent for this topic. As a child, being told the story of Exodus, I was deeply confronted by those words: ‘And God hardened Pharaoh’s heart.’ Hearing that, and then hearing how Pharaoh and Egypt were punished as a result… while simultaneously being told that such a God was ‘Love’ was jarring.

I internalized the idea that ‘Love’ was simply synonymous with obedience and following the rules, a sentiment I think you can relate to. It creates a rigid inner world and a major cognitive dissonance that you are also told to ignore. Eventually, the inevitable happens: you discover that following the rules doesn’t always stop painful experiences or lead to the experience of feeling loved… and here is the really sad part: the young child assumes they are the problem.

I might argue that every child, through whatever cultural or path they walk, eventually hits that wall where the Map (the rules, the words, the expectations) fails to describe the Territory (the raw, painful, and beautiful experience of being alive). When the adults and the “Law” insist the Map is perfect, the child has no choice but to conclude that their own internal compass is broken.

By framing such a experience as archetypal, I’ve been suggesting that the “Exodus” is actually the journey of un-learning that childhood conclusion. The 40 years in the wilderness is the time it takes for that “I am the problem” identity to finally starve to death, so that the person can finally enter the “Promise” as a dancer rather than a servant. A movement from “I must be right” to be loved… to “I am here.” and am Love.