Menu

Peter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,312 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452707
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Everyone: continued thoughts.

    Lao Tzu points past the one who tries to secure stillness. “Return to the root” isn’t something the self accomplishes; it’s what shows itself when its activity softens. This I feel is flow: not forcing stillness or silence, but letting the constancy beneath each step reveal itself, heaven beneath our feet. Then belief in the raft yields to embodiment of arrival. We don’t arrive at a place we already are; we notice it. And from that noticing, action becomes natural, unforced, compassionately precise.

    A brief example: When Jesus says he didn’t come to abolish the law but to fulfill it, the fearful self hears “climb the ladder harder. (sadly this is how his words are usually read) But fulfill means embody, the law becomes living breath, ‘on earth as in heaven.’ Not achievement by the self, but life expressed through us when grasping relaxes. In this, Lao Tzu and Jesus point the same way: the path is fulfilled when it disappears into presence.

    Avoiding religious language lets think of a musician: scales and technique are real, laws of the craft. But at the moment of performance, trying to “find the music” only tightens the hand. When the seeking relaxes, the song plays itself through the musician. The law isn’t abolished; it’s fulfilled – embodied – so completely it disappears into the music. That’s I experience as flow, and it’s the heart of “returning to the root.”

    to simplify… or make more complex 🙂 The raft asks for faith. The shore asks for feet. When the seeker loosens, the ground appears.

    in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452706
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi James

    Not finding stillness, but stepping back from the one who tries to find it” – Yes, And a step further: we say “Tao,” then unsay it. Silence is not a destination, nor a self that finds; it is what remains when finding ceases. The seeker steps off the raft, and the shore is already here.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452564
    Peter
    Participant

    Thanks Thomas and I agree

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452555
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Anita

    Sorry, I missed the mark in my attempt to simplify. It’s difficult to simplify using the very words, ideas, beliefs… being released.

    Your image of running free in the fields is beautiful and full of heart. What I hear in your words is a longing for a time before pain, a place of safety and trust.

    I wonder, if flow were possible for you today, what might it look like? Not in the past, but in the life you have now.
    For me that is what the koan hints at… the ground beneath our feet.

    No pressure, just curious what comes up for you.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452550
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi James and Thomas
    I’m finding a lot of insight in your posts.

    As a third party observer when I read Thomas’s reflections, I did not interpret them as statements of personal belief, but rather as pointing toward something to be embodied in practice. That is why I was somewhat surprised by James’s response, which seemed to frame Thomas as holding onto a belief.

    It feels like both of you are pointing to the same truth but from different sides. Thomas is describing how Zen teachings emphasize that enlightenment is already present, not something to be achieved. James is reminding us that even holding onto that description as a belief can become another form of attachment.

    I wonder if the word ‘believe’ is where the wires cross? Thomas is using it to mean ‘Zen points toward,’ while James hears it as personal belief and something to hold on to. If we shift the language to ‘Zen teaches’ or ‘Zen points to,’ the overlap becomes clearer: enlightenment is not attained, but realized when clinging drops away. In that sense, you’re both describing different aspects of the “stepping off the raft“.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452531
    Peter
    Participant

    Counter-Challenge:
    Take a moment with this koan, no need to overthink, just let the words settle and see what comes up:

    A monk asked the master, “From where does the path arise?”
    The master replied, “From the source, like a river from the mountain.”
    The monk pressed further, “Then may I walk back to the mountain?”
    The master shook his head: “When the river flows, it does not climb. The mountain is not behind you; it is beneath your every step.”

    Then, write a short story of what a day in flow might look like for you. After that, reflect on why you doubt its possibility.
    There’s no right or wrong answer.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452530
    Peter
    Participant

    And because I’m me 🙂 a reflection and story

    When I first began dancing, there were moments when the music carried me, no counting, no measuring, only flow. A quiet noticing. These moments came by accident, before I knew the steps, before the mind whispered, “Let me…”

    Later, as lessons multiplied, I chased the flow by trying to perform correctly, and the experience of flow vanished. Until one night, weary and forgetting myself, the dance remembered me. The steps and rhythm had always been in the music; I only needed to step aside. And then, of course, the mind returned: “Let me…”

    The dance feels like a circle of remembering, arriving, and forgetting… until perhaps, forgetting itself becomes arrival?

    I hear the value of words and quantification, yet as I age, I’m drawn to the moment when it dissolves into fulfillment, when love is the ground and the steps remember themselves.

    I wonder if what feels like a secret teaching is simply resistance to a subtle truth: one must step off the raft before reaching the shore. The Dharma carries us across, yet clinging to it keeps our feet from touching the ground. The secret is not hidden; it is only hard for a self to trust, so the mind insists: “Let me…

    A Day in Flow – (need it be a dream?
    Morning light spills across the kitchen table. Peter pours tea, not hurried, not slow, just present. The steam curls upward, and he watches it dissolve, smiling at how it mirrors his own thoughts. No need to chase them, no need to hold them.

    On his walk to work, he notices the crunch of snow beneath his boots. A child slips, then laughs, and he laughs too, because the joy is contagious. He doesn’t think, I should be kind, he simply bends to help, and the gesture feels as natural as breathing.

    At the office, emails pile up, but he doesn’t feel trapped. He answers what he can, then lets the rest wait. A colleague comes in tense, words sharp, but Peter listens without defense. Something in his quiet presence softens the room. The colleague exhales, as if remembering themselves.

    Evening arrives. He cooks a simple meal, humming to the rhythm of the knife against the cutting board. Later, he sits by the window, watching the sky fade into indigo. No grand revelation, no fireworks, just the steady pulse of life, already whole.
    He laughs softly, remembering: We work for that which no work is required. And the day folds into night, the dance continues without his effort, carrying him gently along.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452527
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Anita,
    A challenge accepted 🙂

    First, I don’t feel Thomas and James are really disagreeing. The words make it seem that way, but underneath, they’re pointing to the same thing.

    So, simply put:

    – The labels and ideas that used to interest me don’t feel as important now. They’re helpful for learning, but once you’ve learned what you need, you can let them go.
    – Put another way: When something becomes clear, when you really know it, you don’t need to “believe” it anymore. You can live it.

    I also feel we often hold on to words because the self feels it needs them for control. That’s where I feel the self is lying to itself, and a part of it always knows it lying.

    I’ll add this: letting go of words feels like something that is intended for later in life…
    Does that make sense?

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452516
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi everyone

    I wonder if all these labels are simply the mind insisting on complexity, a restless attempt to weave patterns where simplicity already breathes. It forgets the subtle truth: the raft must be left behind before the shore can be touched.

    Then I wonder, does the mind truly forget, or does the self know, deep down, that stepping off the raft would resolve the questions… only to find such a step too frightening?

    For a lifetime I have lived in thought, circling the same waters, repeating the same motions. And know I’m surprised to admit that these games of the self interest me less and less.

    The student asked, “Is the shore reached by words?”
    The master replied, “Words are the raft.”
    The student pressed, “Then must I carry them forever?”
    The master said, “Step off before you arrive, or you will never stand.”

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452507
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Everyone. The exchange reminded me of a kaon I’ve been playing with:

    A monk asked the master, “From where does the path arise?”
    The master replied, “From the source, like a river from the mountain.”
    The monk pressed further, “Then may I walk back to the mountain?”
    The master shook his head: “When the river flows, it does not climb. The mountain is not behind you, It is beneath your every step.

    in reply to: What can be better relief then… #452429
    Peter
    Participant

    James, your words and question remind me of a Sufi story.

    There is a legend that God formed a statue of clay in His image and asked the soul to enter it. The soul, being free and unbounded, refused to be imprisoned. Then God commanded the angels to play music, and in ecstasy the soul entered the body so that it might experience the music more clearly.

    “People say that the soul, on hearing that song, entered the body; but in reality the soul itself was song.”- Hafiz

    The soul refused clay.
    The angels sang.
    The soul entered.
    It was not bound.
    It was music.

    in reply to: Disappointed #452330
    Peter
    Participant

    Thanks, Anita. I appreciate the way you noticed that shift.

    Over time, the word love began to feel heavy for me. It carries so many expectations, hopes, and associations that we end up confining it with definitions… a subtle, unskillful tendency I feel, to own and shape it into our image. In that sense, love becomes limiting, a veil, as James notes.

    Awareness, on the other hand, feels lighter. When I stay present with what arises and passes, compassion shows up naturally. And from that compassion emerges a kind of love that doesn’t need to be named… something quieter, less demanding, more like being present to life’s unfolding rhythm.

    So I wouldn’t say I replaced love with awareness. It’s more that awareness revealed a love that doesn’t have to be spoken about, because it’s already there in the way we breathe and live.

    Perhaps I can say it more simply: As words fade, awareness uncovers what was always present.. a compassion, and a love beyond naming.

    in reply to: Blank Canvas #452302
    Peter
    Participant

    Thanks Anita – Perhaps the nicest thing anyone has ever said about me.

    Have a great Thanksgiving weekend.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452301
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Alessa, and again apologies for the mix-up in the other thread.

    I really like the questions you’re raising, they’re ones I’ve wrestled with myself, so I’d love to share a few thoughts.

    Does it matter if we pass willingly or not?
    When I think of “God” as a verb, the word Flow comes to mind. We can resist what is, or we can lean into it with a kind of healthy detachment, engaged but not clinging to results as we would desire or will. To me, that’s why it matters: willingness helps us move with life instead of against it, and that can spare us a lot of unnecessary suffering.

    God’s will happens all the same. Does it matter what we believe?
    I’d say yes, but maybe not in the usual way. Krishnamurti once said, “The constant assertion of belief is an indication of fear.” That really struck me. Belief can bind and divide, and when we cling to it, it often comes from fear rather than freedom. So if we’re going to hold beliefs, they matter… but maybe the deeper invitation is to live without clinging to belief at all, to simply be present. I once asked myself what it would mean to live what I believe. Today I would answer: I’d stop “believing” and live — present – to life.

    And as you said: We’re all part of God’s will, whether we believe it or not. We come from the same source, and we return to it… as a unfolding.

    Happy Thanksgiving!

    in reply to: Blank Canvas #452294
    Peter
    Participant

    LOL – I think I need new glasses. Apologies Alissa

    Anita, I think we both answer the question in James thread.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,312 total)