Menu

“He initiated closeness, then disappeared — still hurting months later”

HomeForumsRelationships“He initiated closeness, then disappeared — still hurting months later”

New Reply
Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #448416
    Adalie
    Participant

    Im not even sure if he knows he does that at all.
    Im in agreement with my dad who thinks. His attitude and behaviors feel like. Bipolar Disorder rather then what his mom said he was diagnosed with as a kid. Which is Disassociative Identity Disorder. DID is where you switch between different personalities. But it seems like he has highs and lows instead. Switching between being mean and then apologizing. If he says something mean or starts something he might apologize later. I didnt know before we got married and moved out. This is both our first place together and his parents moved 2 hrs away.

    Jake I guess might be both a lesson and a what if. I know he wants someone to stick with him and enjoy life with. But if he isnt ready emotional and mentally then he might not find the forever girl for him. I really like Jake.

    #448417
    anita
    Participant

    Good Sunday Morning, Adalie—

    What you shared yesterday is a clear, emotionally articulate account of a relationship that has become emotionally imbalanced, psychologically taxing, and increasingly unsustainable. You’re not in a mutual partnership — you’re functioning as Vince’s emotional regulator. Instead of developing his own coping tools, he relies on your presence, reassurance, and emotional labor to regulate himself.

    Emotional labor is a term I came across only yesterday. It describes the often invisible work of managing emotions — yours and others’ — to keep relationships functioning, often at the cost of your own well-being.

    It includes:

    * Soothing another’s feelings (e.g., calming someone down when they’re upset)

    * Suppressing your own emotions

    * Silencing your own needs

    * Managing your tone of voice, facial expressions, and reactions for the sake of someone else’s comfort

    * Absorbing blame or guilt

    * Offering constant reassurance or validation without reciprocity

    * Walking on eggshells to avoid triggering someone’s moods

    Emotional labor is unpaid, unacknowledged, and leads to burnout, resentment, and emotional depletion. Over time, it erodes your sense of self — because you’re constantly prioritizing someone else’s emotional comfort over your own truth.

    Emotional containment is another new term for me. It refers to when one person’s emotional needs, reactions, or anxieties are so dominant that the other person feels forced to suppress, shrink, or silence their own emotions in order to keep the relationship stable.

    It’s not mutual regulation — it’s one person absorbing the emotional chaos of another, often without consent or reciprocity. It can look like:

    * Avoiding sadness, anger, or joy because it might destabilize the other person

    * Constantly scanning for emotional landmines

    * Feeling reduced to “neutral” or “supportive”

    * No longer asking for what you need because their needs always come first

    * You become the emotional buffer — the one who absorbs, soothes, and stabilizes.

    In your case, Vince’s panic, anxiety, and controlling behavior dominate the emotional space. Your independence, needs, and natural expressions of love are contained — pushed aside, minimized, or punished. You’re not just managing his emotions — you’re sacrificing your own to keep things functional. This leads to emotional exhaustion, loss of self-expression, and a sense of being trapped or erased.

    You also described conditional kindness: Vince is “unusually nice” only when he wants something, and otherwise dismissive or mean. This is a manipulative pattern that creates emotional whiplash and erodes trust.

    Mocking your age, questioning your dependability — these are demeaning tactics that chip away at your self-worth.

    The apology cycle — conflict → apology → repeat — is a classic abuse pattern, even if it’s not physical. The apology doesn’t lead to change; it simply resets the tension.

    Twisting situations to make you feel at fault for setting boundaries is a form of emotional reversal. He disrespects your boundaries, but instead of holding himself accountable, he blames you.

    Unfortunately, you’re tied to him through shared housing and expenses, which makes leaving feel unsafe. His desire to move into a smaller place could further isolate you — physically and emotionally.

    You’re not staying because you want to — you’re staying because you feel you can’t leave.

    You recognized that you’re snapping back, saying mean things, and becoming someone you don’t want to be. That’s not a moral failure — it’s a sign of emotional depletion.

    Your final line — “I hate it” — is a cry from someone who’s still in the fog, but beginning to see the edges of it. And that matters. You are naming what’s happening, and you’re beginning to imagine something different — a relationship where love flows freely, where you feel safe, where your emotional truth isn’t contained or erased.

    Five days ago, you shared something quietly profound about your experience with Jake — not just the physical intimacy, but the emotional texture of it:

    “Yeah it awakened what think I’m missing because it’s not always present at home. Tenderness… he was kind quiet gentle, didn’t make fun of me or force anything. So yeah for sure tenderness and care. Also motivation to go for concealed carry. I was interested in it and have only thought about it. He said “go for it”. And I did. I got my permit still working on step 2. He even suggested a firearm based off me saying my hands are small.”-

    That tenderness — the absence of mockery, pressure, or emotional volatility — is what your nervous system has been craving. It’s not just about Jake. It’s about what you’ve been deprived of in your marriage: emotional safety, gentleness, and respect.

    The concealed carry permit isn’t just a practical step — it’s symbolic. It’s you reclaiming your right to protect yourself, to enforce boundaries, to make decisions in your own favor. It’s you placing your needs at the center of your life, rather than orbiting around Vince’s moods and demands. It’s a gesture of self-trust — sparked not by control, but by care. Even if brief, Jake’s presence reminded you what it feels like to be encouraged, not diminished.

    With care, Anita

    #448418
    anita
    Participant

    Adalie, I became aware of your most recent post after I completed the reply above.

    It makes sense that you’re trying to understand Vince’s behavior through the lens of mental health. Whether it’s bipolar disorder, DID, or something else entirely, what you’re describing — the emotional highs and lows, the cycles of cruelty and apology — is less about diagnosis and more about impact. And the impact on you has been destabilizing, exhausting, and deeply confusing.

    It’s not your job to diagnose or fix him. What matters most is how you feel in the relationship, and whether your emotional safety and stability are being honored.

    As for Jake — it’s okay that he’s both a “lesson” and a “what if.” Sometimes people enter our lives not to stay, but to show us what’s possible. Jake reminded you what tenderness feels like. What encouragement feels like. What it’s like to be seen and supported without being controlled. That’s not trivial — that’s a glimpse of the kind of emotional landscape you deserve.

    You said you really like Jake. That feeling matters. Even if he’s not ready, even if it doesn’t turn into something lasting, the way you felt around him is telling. It’s emotional truth.

    You’re allowed to want something different. You’re allowed to question what you’ve been living. And you’re allowed to hold space for both grief and longing — without rushing to resolve either.

    🤍 Anita

    #448420
    Adalie
    Participant

    Sad thing is Jake may not know that he helped me without even trying. Just saying “go for it” did a lot more then he knows. I only wish he could know. I dont wanna bother he hasnt talked to me since then. I tried just checking on him hoping hes good. But no response. If I didnt do anything wrong then something happened and it sucks not knowing. Maybe being married plays a part. He knew I am married but still let things take place.

    guns are not taboo for him. He hunts and fishes so hes grown up around that and has knowledge and probably made a guess why I was thinking about it.
    After that day I just happened to find a free class at a church and. Did my permit this past April. Im still working on funds for the firearm but I know what I want. Based off of his suggestion. It is a Sig Sauer P365 which is his suggestion but. The model of that is called Sig Sauer P365 2A coyote edition.

    And last year Jake did a demo derby at our local fair and his car number was 2A. Even though 2A for the gun is the 2nd Amendment.
    I know nothing much about guns but when I saw that P365 that was the one I want and felt right based on the details for now. Until I can actual go ask questions and get one.

    #448421
    anita
    Participant

    Adalie, I hear the tenderness in what you shared — the ache of not knowing, the significance of Jake’s encouragement, and the meaning you’ve found in the details surrounding the firearm. It’s clear that moment carried weight for you, and I can feel how deeply you’ve held onto it.

    I wonder if, when you feel ready, it might be possible to gently shift your focus — away from Jake, and toward practical steps that support your healing and clarity within your marriage to Vince.

    🤍 Anita

    #448423
    Adalie
    Participant

    I dont know
    I just feel like this isnt it and I want something else.

Viewing 6 posts - 46 through 51 (of 51 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Please log in OR register.