Menu

Peter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,301 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452741
    Peter
    Participant

    That was well crafted Anita and illuminates what we are circling. I wonder now if we could simplify?

    Anita: Rules and techniques do not vanish. They sink so deeply into embodiment that action flows of itself, without effort, without thought..
    Peter: Yes.. Embodiment is not born of technique; technique arises as its echo. The small self resists this truth, clinging to control and fearing the surrender that freedom requires. In its doubt, the small self imagines the echo to be the source.
    Anita: Yet Flow is simple, just noticing…
    Peter: It moves without measure, without panic, without striving. Only presence remains, and in presence, the Tao flows as you.

    In our dialogues we circle the question: What would it mean to live what we say we believe and know?

    A thought that arises: Realizations are not meant to remain as ideas but to sink into us, becoming embedded, becoming flesh. In this way, embodiment is the quiet shift where belief dissolves, and life itself becomes the expression of knowing. Flow

    To embody is to stop believing about the truth, and to begin living as truth. It is the Tao flowing through us, where realization is no longer separate from action, and knowing is no longer separate from being…

    in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452735
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Everyone
    As I return to the Tao Te Ching, I offer these reflections as invitations… Knowing the Tao cannot be held in words, confined to the categories of noun or verb. In the same way, the words silence, stillness, and the Eternal are not things to grasp, but gestures pointing toward the mystery.

    This reflection weaves together a CAC daily meditation ‘Trusting the Unknown Path’ and thoughts on Tao. In a moment of synchronicity, the two converged, opening naturally, I think into a wider conversation on Flow.

    The Tao moves unseen, shaping all things without striving. What seems like darkness is not absence, but the fertile womb of becoming a possibility of silent night birth, a choiceless choice. To walk the pathless path is to surrender the need for answers and rest in the mystery that carries us beyond ourselves.

    The way of Tao is not to grasp but to release. To not know is the deeper knowing; to not need is the greater freedom. The mystics call this “death,” yet it is only the dissolving of illusion, the transition into compassion. Faith is luminous darkness: the trust that the unseen Way is already guiding us.

    Tao works in secret. If we saw the whole unfolding, we would cling or resist. Instead, Tao liberates us quietly, loosening attachments and dissolving compulsions. The “dark night” is not sinister but sacred, the hidden alchemy by which freedom ripens beneath our awareness.

    No one willingly oversees the undoing of the false self. As deep calls unto deep. Spirit resonates with spirit, the eternal Yes awakening the Yes within us.

    In the poverty of surrender, all that is not Tao dissolves. What remains is the infinite beauty already given, Tao as Tao, Love as Love, Self as Self.

    So what dissolves?
    Not Tao itself, which is eternal and unchanging. Not phenomena, which continue to arise and pass.
    What dissolves is illusion of the false sense of separation, the illusion of a self standing outside the flow.

    All things arise from Tao, like mist from the mountain, like waves from the sea.
    Yet what is not Tao? Only the veil of forgetting, the dream of separation, the shadow of grasping.
    The mist dissolves, not the mountain. The wave returns, not the ocean.
    Illusion fades, but Tao remains, the unborn, the undying, the pathless path, the eternal Yes.
    Everything arises from Tao, but not everything is seen truly. What dissolves is the veil that hides Tao from itself.

    The Way cannot be possessed, only trusted. It is not a road but a rhythm, not a map but a mystery. To speak of Tao is to trace the outline of what cannot be named. To listen for Tao is to rest in the space before thought. To walk with Tao is to trust the pathless path, where dissolving and arising are one movement, and where all that is hidden reveals itself in its own time.

    in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452709
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Anita
    Thank you for taking up the challenge.

    Flow, or wu wei, doesn’t mean forcing yourself to stop caring or to stop feeling. It means not doing anything extra on top of what’s already here: notice the pain, and don’t add the fight with the past. Grief and non‑attachment can coexist… keep the love, release the argument with what cannot be changed.

    Self‑approval matters… though I’m wary of tying it to flow as it can slide into striving. Self‑approval can reduce self‑criticism where as Flow notices the feeling with no extra effort, no score.

    For tonight: take one slow exhale. Notice one thing you did today that came naturally. Let your body settle.
    May you have a good Tao night of sleep and rest. Amen.

    in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452708
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Alessa,

    I appreciate your grounded views.

    For me, flow doesn’t ask life to look different. Embodied, everything is received differently… the calendar stays, the grip softens, heaven beneath our feet.

    in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452707
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Everyone: continued thoughts.

    Lao Tzu points past the one who tries to secure stillness. “Return to the root” isn’t something the self accomplishes; it’s what shows itself when its activity softens. This I feel is flow: not forcing stillness or silence, but letting the constancy beneath each step reveal itself, heaven beneath our feet. Then belief in the raft yields to embodiment of arrival. We don’t arrive at a place we already are; we notice it. And from that noticing, action becomes natural, unforced, compassionately precise.

    A brief example: When Jesus says he didn’t come to abolish the law but to fulfill it, the fearful self hears “climb the ladder harder. (sadly this is how his words are usually read) But fulfill means embody, the law becomes living breath, ‘on earth as in heaven.’ Not achievement by the self, but life expressed through us when grasping relaxes. In this, Lao Tzu and Jesus point the same way: the path is fulfilled when it disappears into presence.

    Avoiding religious language lets think of a musician: scales and technique are real, laws of the craft. But at the moment of performance, trying to “find the music” only tightens the hand. When the seeking relaxes, the song plays itself through the musician. The law isn’t abolished; it’s fulfilled – embodied – so completely it disappears into the music. That’s I experience as flow, and it’s the heart of “returning to the root.”

    to simplify… or make more complex 🙂 The raft asks for faith. The shore asks for feet. When the seeker loosens, the ground appears.

    in reply to: Flow of Rise and Fall #452706
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi James

    Not finding stillness, but stepping back from the one who tries to find it” – Yes, And a step further: we say “Tao,” then unsay it. Silence is not a destination, nor a self that finds; it is what remains when finding ceases. The seeker steps off the raft, and the shore is already here.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452564
    Peter
    Participant

    Thanks Thomas and I agree

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452555
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Anita

    Sorry, I missed the mark in my attempt to simplify. It’s difficult to simplify using the very words, ideas, beliefs… being released.

    Your image of running free in the fields is beautiful and full of heart. What I hear in your words is a longing for a time before pain, a place of safety and trust.

    I wonder, if flow were possible for you today, what might it look like? Not in the past, but in the life you have now.
    For me that is what the koan hints at… the ground beneath our feet.

    No pressure, just curious what comes up for you.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452550
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi James and Thomas
    I’m finding a lot of insight in your posts.

    As a third party observer when I read Thomas’s reflections, I did not interpret them as statements of personal belief, but rather as pointing toward something to be embodied in practice. That is why I was somewhat surprised by James’s response, which seemed to frame Thomas as holding onto a belief.

    It feels like both of you are pointing to the same truth but from different sides. Thomas is describing how Zen teachings emphasize that enlightenment is already present, not something to be achieved. James is reminding us that even holding onto that description as a belief can become another form of attachment.

    I wonder if the word ‘believe’ is where the wires cross? Thomas is using it to mean ‘Zen points toward,’ while James hears it as personal belief and something to hold on to. If we shift the language to ‘Zen teaches’ or ‘Zen points to,’ the overlap becomes clearer: enlightenment is not attained, but realized when clinging drops away. In that sense, you’re both describing different aspects of the “stepping off the raft“.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452531
    Peter
    Participant

    Counter-Challenge:
    Take a moment with this koan, no need to overthink, just let the words settle and see what comes up:

    A monk asked the master, “From where does the path arise?”
    The master replied, “From the source, like a river from the mountain.”
    The monk pressed further, “Then may I walk back to the mountain?”
    The master shook his head: “When the river flows, it does not climb. The mountain is not behind you; it is beneath your every step.”

    Then, write a short story of what a day in flow might look like for you. After that, reflect on why you doubt its possibility.
    There’s no right or wrong answer.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452530
    Peter
    Participant

    And because I’m me 🙂 a reflection and story

    When I first began dancing, there were moments when the music carried me, no counting, no measuring, only flow. A quiet noticing. These moments came by accident, before I knew the steps, before the mind whispered, “Let me…”

    Later, as lessons multiplied, I chased the flow by trying to perform correctly, and the experience of flow vanished. Until one night, weary and forgetting myself, the dance remembered me. The steps and rhythm had always been in the music; I only needed to step aside. And then, of course, the mind returned: “Let me…”

    The dance feels like a circle of remembering, arriving, and forgetting… until perhaps, forgetting itself becomes arrival?

    I hear the value of words and quantification, yet as I age, I’m drawn to the moment when it dissolves into fulfillment, when love is the ground and the steps remember themselves.

    I wonder if what feels like a secret teaching is simply resistance to a subtle truth: one must step off the raft before reaching the shore. The Dharma carries us across, yet clinging to it keeps our feet from touching the ground. The secret is not hidden; it is only hard for a self to trust, so the mind insists: “Let me…

    A Day in Flow – (need it be a dream?
    Morning light spills across the kitchen table. Peter pours tea, not hurried, not slow, just present. The steam curls upward, and he watches it dissolve, smiling at how it mirrors his own thoughts. No need to chase them, no need to hold them.

    On his walk to work, he notices the crunch of snow beneath his boots. A child slips, then laughs, and he laughs too, because the joy is contagious. He doesn’t think, I should be kind, he simply bends to help, and the gesture feels as natural as breathing.

    At the office, emails pile up, but he doesn’t feel trapped. He answers what he can, then lets the rest wait. A colleague comes in tense, words sharp, but Peter listens without defense. Something in his quiet presence softens the room. The colleague exhales, as if remembering themselves.

    Evening arrives. He cooks a simple meal, humming to the rhythm of the knife against the cutting board. Later, he sits by the window, watching the sky fade into indigo. No grand revelation, no fireworks, just the steady pulse of life, already whole.
    He laughs softly, remembering: We work for that which no work is required. And the day folds into night, the dance continues without his effort, carrying him gently along.

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452527
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Anita,
    A challenge accepted 🙂

    First, I don’t feel Thomas and James are really disagreeing. The words make it seem that way, but underneath, they’re pointing to the same thing.

    So, simply put:

    – The labels and ideas that used to interest me don’t feel as important now. They’re helpful for learning, but once you’ve learned what you need, you can let them go.
    – Put another way: When something becomes clear, when you really know it, you don’t need to “believe” it anymore. You can live it.

    I also feel we often hold on to words because the self feels it needs them for control. That’s where I feel the self is lying to itself, and a part of it always knows it lying.

    I’ll add this: letting go of words feels like something that is intended for later in life…
    Does that make sense?

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452516
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi everyone

    I wonder if all these labels are simply the mind insisting on complexity, a restless attempt to weave patterns where simplicity already breathes. It forgets the subtle truth: the raft must be left behind before the shore can be touched.

    Then I wonder, does the mind truly forget, or does the self know, deep down, that stepping off the raft would resolve the questions… only to find such a step too frightening?

    For a lifetime I have lived in thought, circling the same waters, repeating the same motions. And know I’m surprised to admit that these games of the self interest me less and less.

    The student asked, “Is the shore reached by words?”
    The master replied, “Words are the raft.”
    The student pressed, “Then must I carry them forever?”
    The master said, “Step off before you arrive, or you will never stand.”

    in reply to: Real Spirituality #452507
    Peter
    Participant

    Hi Everyone. The exchange reminded me of a kaon I’ve been playing with:

    A monk asked the master, “From where does the path arise?”
    The master replied, “From the source, like a river from the mountain.”
    The monk pressed further, “Then may I walk back to the mountain?”
    The master shook his head: “When the river flows, it does not climb. The mountain is not behind you, It is beneath your every step.

    in reply to: What can be better relief then… #452429
    Peter
    Participant

    James, your words and question remind me of a Sufi story.

    There is a legend that God formed a statue of clay in His image and asked the soul to enter it. The soul, being free and unbounded, refused to be imprisoned. Then God commanded the angels to play music, and in ecstasy the soul entered the body so that it might experience the music more clearly.

    “People say that the soul, on hearing that song, entered the body; but in reality the soul itself was song.”- Hafiz

    The soul refused clay.
    The angels sang.
    The soul entered.
    It was not bound.
    It was music.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 1,301 total)