Home→Forums→Relationships→Should a “Cheating” Girlfriend be forgiven over a technicality?→Reply To: Should a “Cheating” Girlfriend be forgiven over a technicality?
Dear Tee,
“Because she seduced him over those 3 months? He couldn’t resist her? BTW did you explicitly tell him not to communicate with her after you two broke up? Because as far as I know, they were friends/acquaintances too – he didn’t know her only through you, right?” I find the seduction part very difficult to believe but what does that have to do with him fueling the fight between us? We already broke up so if he was interested in her, then talk about each other instead of talking about things that aren’t even true about me. And no, I did not tell him to not communicate with her because whoever she entertains is none of my business, nor do I care. I just want my money and I will be on my way.
“The person who is causing the fights is her – she is accusing you of having a poor choice of friends” Yes but she is also accusing me of cheating and etc, and that theory only came about cause of the misunderstandings that the guy created.
“Knowing her intentions, she didn’t appreciate the silence. Because she wants to lure you back in.” Yes I know that but I already told the guy that she is pestering me over foolishness and that I don’t want her to have more excuses to continue fighting me. He was the one who even suggested that I ignore her entirely so what is the logic behind him fueling the fights?
“So can you be cold enough and tell her that you don’t want to accompany her to the ATM at night, and that you only are willing to go with her if she has your next installment ($100)?” I can.
“Or, I have a better idea. Why don’t you make a bargain with her. Something like this: “if I accompany you, and if there is less than 100 bucks, I am taking all the money there is on your account. Maybe I’ll let you keep $10. Because you dragged me to the ATM in vain. So if you do, I am warning you, next time I am taking all your money. Is it a deal?” Can you be cold enough to say that?” I could say that, but she won’t agree to it. What then?
“I would still talk to him and hear his side of the story. Because if you don’t, you participate in her game, you side with her against him. And you should never side with a liar and a manipulator, specially not without checking the other side of the story.” Idk, I still don’t like the idea of trusting neither of them. I think it is just better to not trust anyone at all because at this point idk who can be trusted or not.
Paradoxy