- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 2 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2021 at 9:46 am #384178FurryRatParticipant
Sometimes I feel like I am a psychopath. I’ve been trying for several years to not be such an argumentative and combative person, and in my real-life interactions with people, I feel like I’ve succeeded. However, I still take twisted joy from winning online arguments with people I do not know. I feel like I am extremely negative when I do so, but I feel happy when I feel like I’ve won (especially if they stop responding). The thing is, I don’t want to feel this way, but I slip into this cycle of trying to be a better person and falling into extended periods of arguing with people online. The worst thing about this is, when I get into such a mood, I feel extremely proud of myself if I feel like I’ve inflicted some kind of emotional harm to the person’s self-esteem.
I can only reflect on this when I manage to break out of that mood (like now) but it can take months. I know that what I’m doing is wrong, even when I’m engaging in it. But I don’t feel guilty until I begin to think about it. This has been happening since more than 10 years ago, and I always feel like I will become a better person, but I seem to go back to that behavior again.
I am at a complete loss, but I am not sure if I need to get professional help for this. This is not really affecting my life since I’m doing ok in all other aspects, but I don’t want to be this way.
August 11, 2021 at 4:00 am #384498TeeParticipantHi miliMeow,
I’ve only just seen your post, that’s why the delay… I believe that when we want to prove our point (like you do in online arguments), it may come from wanting external approval. Like, you don’t feel good about yourself otherwise, and you need to win an argument in order to feel better about yourself.
Maybe for you it’s not so much about external approval, as much as the need to feel better than the other person (I won, you lost!). It could stem from your childhood, where you perhaps felt you’re always losing arguments, or were bullied, or something like that?
August 11, 2021 at 5:34 am #384502AnonymousGuestDear miliMeow:
“I feel like I am a psychopath…I still take twisted joy from winning online arguments with people I do not know… when I get into such a mood, I feel extremely proud of myself if I feel like I’ve inflicted some kind of emotional harm to the person’s self-esteem“-
– I don’t know about the psychopath part, but clearly you have deep seated anger that gets relieved when you argue with people online and cause them some emotional harm. When your anger is relieved, you feel good (joy and pride).
Would you like to share about your deep seated anger… or would you rather argue?
anita
August 11, 2021 at 8:11 am #384513PeterParticipantWhat is it they say during a break up… Its not you is me..
This might not be ‘you’ as much as the communication means. This new communication technology, still in its infancy is something we don’t fully understand yet. We are I think becoming more dependent on ‘smart’ technology to act as our memory and decrement and this is impacting how we communicate and make decision. In a way the ‘smart tech’ is becoming a new kind of consciousness – Id, ego, superego, ‘self’… The internet consciousness in its infancy is at the Id level – reactionary, fight or flight… There is very little ‘self’ awareness within the inter-net and its very easy to get caught up in it.
Something about being in a virtual realty that brings out our Id, our shadow and projections. That said being aware of that we can use such interactions as ways to examine our shadow and projections and pull them back. Kind of like what your doing asking the question – Am I this online persona, is that the ‘real’ me?
I did a two-week experiment where I commented on current news stories of a major news network. Within a week I found myself getting aggressive, angry, frustrated… I discovered I really wanted my opinions to matter and change the minds of others. It occurred to me that everyone wanted the same thing. In such a space it is no wonder that any news comment section deteriorates in to negativity so quickly.
Overall, I found the engagement toxic, not because people didn’t agree with me or like what I said but because the negativity started to impact my engagement with the nonvirtual world. I could see myself becoming the grumpy old man that can’t see anything positive in anything or anyone.
Why did I think/need my opinions mattered so much they had to change others? Why did I feel the need to communicate and engage with people I would never meet? Why did I need validation from people I would never meet?
I suspect most of online interactions I’m talking to myself. Someone says something that resonates with me and I attempt to understand my own thoughts by responding. Which is why I responded to your post.
August 12, 2021 at 3:04 am #384570FurryRatParticipantTo TeaK: It’s possible, since this behavior actually started pretty young. I’m 32 now, and the earliest instance I can remember of “trolling” people online seemed to begin when I was 15 years old. I wasn’t really bullied though, and I don’t remember any specific instances of losing arguments that were significant. But the childhood angle is probably worth thinking about.
To anita: I don’t think my anger gets relieved when I argue with people online. I think it’s magnified instead, so I get even more upset and angry if I continue doing this for a long time. Which is why it’s so puzzling. I only started realizing the harm this kind of behavior is doing to my emotional health, and I try to wean myself off of it and be nice on the internet. But before long, some triggering post on the internet brings me back to that state and I begin trying to mentally torture people online again.
To Peter: That is an interesting experiment. I think I may simply need to delete accounts where I can possibly reply to people anonymously and consciously choose not to engage with people in that manner. I think my experience is quite similar to yours. It’s a great question to ask: “Why do I need to change others?” I don’t.
Thank you everyone for responding to me.
August 12, 2021 at 7:16 am #384575AnonymousGuestDear miliMeow:
You are welcome.
“I don’t think my anger gets relieved when I argue with people online. I think it’s magnified instead, so I get even more upset and angry if I continue doing this for a long time. Which is why it’s so puzzling“- seems like at first this activity relieved your anger/ made you feel better, so you kept doing it and you got hooked on it: it became a habit/ an addiction. When a person starts taking a drug, an opioid, it feels good the first 10 times or so (I am guessing). But on the 11th time, it doesn’t feel good anymore, but the person is already hooked on it, so he/ she keeps taking it. It’s just too hard to stop.
In which case, deleting accounts where you can possibly reply to people anonymously, like you mentioned in your recent post, is a good idea. In the opioid analogy, it would be like deleting the contact information to your drug source, or relocating so that your drug source is not available to you anymore.
“I try to wean myself off of it and be nice on the internet. But before long, some triggering post on the internet brings me back to that state and I begin trying to mentally torture people online again“-
You used the verb “wean off” which is often used in the context of drug addiction.
medical xpress. com: ” There is an urgent need to understand why people troll. Recent Australian estimates show about one in three internet users have experienced online harassment… Internet trolling is defined as a malicious online behavior, characterized by aggressive and deliberate provocation of others. ‘Trolls’ seek to provoke, upset and harm others via inflammatory messages and posts… Trolling can cause significant harm and distress. It is associated with serious physical and psychological effects, including disrupted sleep, lowered self-esteem, depression, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and in some cases, even suicide. In 2019, The Australia Institute estimated trolling and online abuse had cost the Australian economy up to $3.7 billion in health costs and lost income….The most powerful predictor of trolling was sadism. The more someone enjoys hurting others, the more likely it is they will troll… The significance of psychopathy in the results also indicates trolls have an empathy deficit, particularly when it comes to their ability to experience and internalize other people’s emotions”.
psychology today. com: “According to the Pew Research Center (Online Harassment, 2017), 41 percent of Americans have themselves experienced online harassment, and over 60 percent report having been witness to such actions. While many of these behaviors are of the milder variety, nearly 20 percent of people in the Pew survey reported they had “been subjected to particularly severe forms of harassment online, such as physical threats, harassment over a sustained period, sexual harassment or stalking… Because loneliness represents a state of chronic frustration and unmet need, it can trigger aggression toward others as a way to discharge tension or express oneself.. psychopathy and everyday sadism have been found to correlate more strongly with internet trolling in previous studies”-
Do you agree with my anger-relief turned addiction theory, and do you think that an empathy deficit, sadism, or everyday sadism- defined as “the pleasure taken at another person’s distress”, and/ or loneliness (boldfaced and italicized by me, above) apply to you, in the context of trolling and otherwise in life?
anita
August 12, 2021 at 7:41 am #384577FurryRatParticipantHello anita,
It does feel like somewhat of an addiction now, if I am to be completely honest. I’ve deactivated the accounts in which I am able to behave in that way, so I hope it sticks this time. Because you mention it as being addiction, I started looking at possible triggers of these behavior. I think due to the pandemic I have been frequenting a lot of forums where other people’s views are not aligned with mine, especially with regards to race issues and vaccination status. It’s become such a trigger that I think I have been treating these online commentators as sub-humans in extreme cases. It’s also easy to do so because I cannot see the human aspects of them since we are all anonymous.
I am not sure if I lack empathy, or if the empathy deficit is specific to people who I regard as having views not aligned with my own. Close friends have previously mentioned to me that they found it puzzling that I am able to be extremely nice to friends but extremely mean to people I don’t care about.
As for loneliness, I think that may apply less since I am keeping a small and tight circle of friends on purpose as I have previously felt like behaving badly towards people I do not care about. But the other two seems to be more applicable. I’m particularly worried about sadism, and am worried that I have a personality disorder.
August 12, 2021 at 8:24 am #384582AnonymousGuestDear miliMeow:
“due to the pandemic I have been frequenting a lot of forums where other people’s views are not aligned with mine, especially with regards to race issues and vaccination status. It’s become such a trigger“-
– To the question of sadism, which particularly worries you: for me to understand you better, it would be relevant for me to know those “other people’s views” regarding race and vaccination status. Can you state their views which trigger you so much (not so to open a debate, as there will be no debate)?
anita
August 12, 2021 at 8:38 am #384584FurryRatParticipantHello anita,
With regards to vaccination status, I am pro-vaccination. But there have recently been an influx of anti-vaxxers going around convincing the elderly folks not to get vaccinated.
With regards to my views on race, I am afraid of specifying too much as I would not want people to know where I am from. I live in a country with many different races. In recent years, people have begun to co-opt a term from the western world which I will call [race]-privilege. I am of the opinion that while there is racism here (and everywhere), it is not a systemic or structural issues. Laws have not been written to disadvantage certain races. However, people have recently taken it upon themselves to attack people of the supposedly privileged race, which is triggering and upsetting for me. I notice that these issues do not surface in my day-to-day interactions, but is disproportionately magnified online in specific forums.
August 12, 2021 at 9:26 am #384586AnonymousGuestDear miliMeow:
I understand and share your outrage in regard to the two issues, particularly in regard to the first very current public health major problem. I frequent a certain taproom where not long ago I talked about how wonderful vaccines are and an anti-vaxxer verbally attacked me. I remained as calm as possible and did not engage in an argument or a fight with her because nothing good would have resulted from it. If I argued, she would have felt stronger about her position, not weaker. And in addition to it, I would have made it very unpleasant to visit the taproom again.
And this is what happens online, in the forums you mentioned: people argue, fight, it gets ugly and the result: no one changes their minds and everyone feels even stronger about their initial positions. It is not only a waste of time, but it accomplishes the opposite of what you wish to accomplish.
There is a prayer called The Serenity Prayer, it says in part: “Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference”- can you tell me if and how you can connect this prayer to what we are discussing here?
anita
August 12, 2021 at 9:47 am #384589FurryRatParticipantHello anita,
That is a very nice passage indeed. It certainly seems that people who are entrenched in their views will not budge, much like me who is convinced that the vaccination is a positive thing, it seems like people who are convinced of the other side of the argument will also not budge. Maybe it means.. to let go of the notions or desire to enact change on those who will not change, and to instead focus on changing those who are not entrenched in their views and those who may be unsure of their views? I can certainly see how this is a much better use of my time than attacking people online.
For now.. I think I simply have to avoid the triggering events and avoid forums where people may push anti-vax views. It is difficult but I will try. Some of these views are toxic and also plastered all over the Web, so maybe I just need to learn how to calm myself down.
August 12, 2021 at 10:29 am #384592AnonymousGuestDear miliMeow:
“Maybe it means.. to let go of the notions or desire to enact change on those who will not change, and to instead focus on changing those who are not entrenched in their views and those who may be unsure of their views?“- yes, I agree. And I agree with the rest of your recent post.
anita
August 12, 2021 at 12:29 pm #384600FurryRatParticipantThank you anita, TeaK, and Peter, for having a chat with me. There is certainly more I have to learn to manage, but it’s been very insightful to talk about things. It’s help me gain another layer of understanding about myself. I hope I will start becoming the person I want to be. Thanks again!
And to anita, I remember you very well. I actually posted in the Relationships forum about 3 years ago and you were also around to help tide me through a really difficult time. I didn’t post using the same account because I lost my login credentials for that user handle, but I just want you to know you were of so much help to me. Thank you!
August 12, 2021 at 12:36 pm #384601AnonymousGuestDear miliMeow:
You are very welcome, and thank you for your kind words! Post again here or start a new thread on any topic that comes up for you, and I will be glad to read and reply to you again.
anita
August 13, 2021 at 12:54 am #384615TeeParticipantDear miliMeow,
you are very welcome. I understand your need to react to some of the anti-vaxxer and other arguments, which go strongly against your views and can even be objectively harmful, such as people not getting their vaccine and ending up dying, or people walking around without symptoms and infecting others.
I too was pretty active on social media, up until the vaccine came out, trying to convince people to keep the measures, wear a mask, warning them how insidious and dangerous this virus can be etc. Some of my acquaintances wouldn’t budge, and it would upset me. Then I did some soul searching and realized that the reason I get so upset with them is my own fear: I was afraid that they would contribute to spreading the virus, and eventually I or my loved ones would catch it, and we might die. So by trying to convince them, I was basically trying to protect my own life and the life of my loved ones.
I think it would make sense to ask yourself the same question: why do I have the need to change other people’s minds? What am I afraid would happen if they wouldn’t?
Another problem you mentioned is that you enjoy inflicting emotional pain on the people who don’t agree with you, that you enjoy insulting and offending them etc. This is probably a separate issue, not necessarily related to your need to change other people’s opinions. And it might be related to your childhood. You said in your reply to me:
It’s possible, since this behavior actually started pretty young. I’m 32 now, and the earliest instance I can remember of “trolling” people online seemed to begin when I was 15 years old. I wasn’t really bullied though, and I don’t remember any specific instances of losing arguments that were significant. But the childhood angle is probably worth thinking about.
What happened when you were 15? Was there any significant change in your life?
-
AuthorPosts