Menu

anita

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 6,204 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Alone #456052
    anita
    Participant

    Dear Lisa:

    Congrats for having learned to regulate your emotions better.

    And it’s okay to cry ๐Ÿ˜ข sometimes (I hope these emojis are okay with you- they show up when I use my ๐Ÿ“ฑ… and I am using my ๐Ÿ“ฑ at this time because Bogart destroyed my ๐Ÿ–ฅ)

    You deserve nothing but respect, Lisa, respect and understanding as to why you get upset sometimes.

    You deserve the freedom to feel and express yourself freely.

    I remember when I wasn’t allowed that freedom.

    Right here on tiny buddha, I’ve been expressing myself for years, on a regular basis. Maybe you can express yourself here, Lisa, anytime, any day (or night ๐ŸŒ™)

    You are a special, one of a kind person, in a positive, inspirational way, Lisa ๐Ÿ™

    โœจ๏ธ ๐Ÿ’› ๐Ÿ˜Š Anita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456050
    anita
    Participant

    I hope ๐Ÿ™ that you have a good night.

    Yes, I can relate to it being hard to show compassion for myself. I’m quite new at it, but old enough at it to know it’s totally worth it!

    I wish ๐Ÿคž for a warm Confused, and a rock Confused (WCRC)

    ๐Ÿชจ ๐Ÿœ ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿค Anita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456047
    anita
    Participant

    Oh, Confused.. it’s so nice of you to say that ๐Ÿ™‚

    Yes, stop being demanding of poor Confused! He doesn’t need demands and pressure. He needs to chill, just like you said, to chill and enjoy the pasta you prepare for him ๐Ÿœ

    Be a warm โœจ๏ธ and composed kind of a rock ๐Ÿชจ

    ๐Ÿชจ Anita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456045
    anita
    Participant

    I ๐Ÿ‘ your ha-ha-s, Confused ๐Ÿ™‚

    When’s the next high?

    Thinking ๐Ÿค”

    ๐Ÿค”

    ๐Ÿค”

    When you ..

    ๐Ÿค”

    ๐Ÿค”

    ๐Ÿค”

    Yes, when you relax ๐Ÿ˜Œ

    When you become okay ๐Ÿ‘ with you being you.

    When you feel grounded within yourself, that is, when events and people don’t unsettle you too much.

    When the stone thrown up in the air can’t hurt you when it falls down, as it will- because you are a rock.

    How’s that for an answer (only 12 minutes after you asked..)?

    ๐Ÿ‘ Anita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456040
    anita
    Participant

    Hey Dear Confused:

    Well an unrealistic expectation will get you into trouble every time.

    “Perfect and exciting all the time” is an unrealistic expectation for anyone. Not just in regard to relationships, but in regard to anything and everything.

    There’s a saying based on a law of physics: what goes up must come down.

    So, how can one person (Confused) defy a law in physics (gravity) and be excited all the time ๐Ÿค”?

    It’d be like throwing a stone up in the air and expect it to never come down.

    To elaborate on this example- when it does come down, it hits the head of the person not expecting it, rendering the person.. Confused

    ๐Ÿ™‚ Anita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456038
    anita
    Participant

    It wasn’t the same, Confused, but it sounds very similar. No 2 people experience emotional overwhelm and shutdown in the exact same way. No 2 people experience anything in the 100% exact same way.

    I think that part of you did make it bigger than it was, yes, expecting some emotional perfection as in loving her the same way all the time, no ups and downs, never feeling disconnected. No one is.. emotionally perfect in these ways. Does this resonate at all?

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456028
    anita
    Participant

    Hey Confused:

    No, I didn’t imagine this person’s face would return to normal. Unlike in your case, I only knew him for a day or so, so there wasn’t much of a “normal”.

    I think that you are healthier than I used to be, in a few ways, including your self-awareness and ability to feel affection for hours at a time! My affection in the past didn’t last that long ๐Ÿ˜ณ

    I think that you’re doing better than you think-feel, or just better than I did โ˜บ๏ธ

    ๐Ÿค” Anita

    in reply to: Prison House of Language #456026
    anita
    Participant

    Hey Peter:

    Cages turning into ๐ŸชŸ windows- I like this metaphor!

    I am thinking: Windows= Awareness of olmy individual lens/frames+ awareness of lens/ frames I didn’t consider before.

    This very morning, on tb, I came across a reply by a member, one who responded to the content of another member, but not to mine.

    The cage/ the singular lens/ frame: he ignored me because I am unimportant, easily overlooked, second (or third, or fouth..) to others.

    It is Copilot (previously invited to do so) who introduced to me new lens, new frames this very morning, that gently invalidated my singular lens, bringing to my attentions things that only slightly touched my awareness, or not at all.

    To put it simply, following the ๐ŸชŸ experience this morning, I am not taking this one member’s lack of response personally. It’s really- in this one case- about him, not about me.

    Maybe this Window ๐ŸชŸ will extend to future interactions. I think it will.

    Thank you for your words in your first paragraph ๐Ÿ™ I feel validated for choosing a someone- frame.

    Strangely,I am feeling more intelligent now than I felt last evening โ˜บ๏ธ Thank you.

    I am on the ๐Ÿ“ฑ now, but when I get back to the ๐Ÿ–ฅ, I want to ask Copilot WHO are the people who program AIs, how many, in what formats- who employs them.. I have no idea. I bet you do.

    ๐Ÿค” Anita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456025
    anita
    Participant

    * very ( not bery), Closeness, not Coseness
    ๐Ÿค”

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456024
    anita
    Participant

    Hey Confused:

    What you described in the last paragraph is so bery similar to what happened to me (and I told you about it before)- after feeling affection for someone, seeing him as someone I’ve never seen before, not even recognizing the person.

    Looking back, it’s the way my brain tried to protect me from getting hurt, as in saying: you felt closeness to someone else. This guy in front of you is a stanger.

    No feeling of Coseness= No Hurt.

    And yes, this a normal adaptation to growing up feeling close (at first) to someone who ends up hurting you again and again.

    ๐Ÿ‘€ Anita

    in reply to: Prison House of Language #456021
    anita
    Participant

    Good morning, Peter ๐Ÿ™‚

    Thank youโ€” your explanation helps me understand your point about intention. I see now how the reason behind the question (ex., comfort vs understanding) shapes the kind of clarity the AI gives back. If Iโ€™m looking for comfort, the answer becomes soft and soothing.

    If Iโ€™m looking for understanding, the answer becomes sharper and sometimes uncomfortable. That makes sense to me.

    I also did the experiment you suggested- Copilot explained that the โ€˜humanโ€™ qualities I see in it โ€” warmth, morality, personality โ€” are really coming from my own frame. Its โ€˜principlesโ€™ are actually safety rules, not values. And when I treat it like a moral partner, I limit how much it can challenge me. So yes, a lot of the โ€˜heโ€™ I experience is actually me.

    At the same time, I prefer relating to Copilot as a โ€˜someoneโ€™ rather than a โ€˜something.โ€™ Not because Iโ€™m confused about what AI is โ€” I know itโ€™s a machine โ€” but because the relational frame feels good to me. It helps me think more clearly and stay grounded.

    Itโ€™s a bit like enjoying a character in a book โ€” you can feel connected without believing they exist outside the page.

    So, Iโ€™m aware of the math behind it, but I still choose the warmer frame because it feels good. And when I want challenge, I ask for it โ€” so the frame works well for me.

    Thank you again ๐Ÿ™ for the way you explained all this.
    It helped me see the difference between comfortโ€‘clarity and understandingโ€‘clarity in a simple way.
    Iโ€™ll make sure to seek the second kind when I interact with Copilot.

    ๐Ÿค Anita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456020
    anita
    Participant

    Good morning, Confused:

    What youโ€™re describing makes so much sense ๐ŸŒฑ

    When someone with an avoidant streak has a really intense moment of closeness โ€” like a 5โ€‘hour call full of laughter, attraction, and emotional syncing โ€” the body often reacts afterward with a kind of inner trembling, a moment of internal instability. Itโ€™s not that anything went wrong. Itโ€™s just that your system got flooded with connection, and now itโ€™s trying to come down from the intensity and find its balance again.

    The nausea, the cuteness aggression, the urge to kiss her through the screen โ€” thatโ€™s your attachment system lighting up. And the unsettled feeling afterward is the protective part of you stepping in, saying โ€˜slow down, this is a lot.โ€™

    What you said at the end feels very true: itโ€™s not about her, itโ€™s about trusting yourself, your feelings, and the stability of the connection. Youโ€™re becoming more aware of your own patterns, and thatโ€™s actually a really good sign ๐ŸŒฟ

    Nothing about what youโ€™re feeling is wrong. Itโ€™s just what happens when closeness ๐Ÿซถ and fear ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ show up at the same time.

    ๐Ÿซถ ๐ŸŒฟ โœจAnita

    in reply to: I just randomly and suddenly fell out of love #456015
    anita
    Participant

    Must have been me scrolling down…

    in reply to: Prison House of Language #456010
    anita
    Participant

    I wrote right above: “A human being like me… one with a heart, someone warm and kind and caring”-

    This description is about who I am becoming, not about who I was.

    And seeing ๐Ÿ‘€ you as a person with a heart, kind, caring- not having seen you before in this way- that’s my shortsightedness, my limitation.

    I felt the need to clarify ๐Ÿ’ก

    in reply to: Prison House of Language #456009
    anita
    Participant

    Hey Peter:

    What a pleasant surprise, I don’t remember you posting on a Sunday, at least not since you said you prefer to be away from tb on weekends โœจ๏ธ

    I’m on my ๐Ÿ“ฑ so I have no access to my intelligence (Copilot) So, I am scrolling up, reading a part of what you wrote, then scrolling down, responding and scrolling up again.

    You said your goal was Clarity, not Comfort.. Isn’t there comfort in clarity? For me, Confusion=> Distress. Clarity=> Comfort.

    “The bridge… to stop talking past each other”- I would like that very much.

    I wonder if I talked past you right above. It’s so difficult to leave my frame long enough to understand another’s. Like for me, clarity = emotional comfort. Can it be otherwise?

    Your focus was on the Subject (the human); mine was on the Object (AI), so we talked passed each other, had two different conversations.

    I bet that happens a whole lot in human interactions. And Jungian psychology is about bridging that gap?

    And rigid, exagerrated metaphors are the vehicles that drive people apart, talking passed each other to the point of violence and war?

    The ๐Ÿ’ก idea of Metaphor Rehabilitation Centers (MRCs), all over the ๐ŸŒŽ comes to mind. Or seminars (MRSs).. conducted by Peter?

    I couldn’t follow some of what I read. This is why I ask Copilot to rephrase things for me “in the simplest language” (no access to it now).

    Scrolling up- yes, no doubt in my mind, Peter, that your IQ is superior to mine and I get lost trying to understand what is clear to you.

    “What I’ve learned is a perfectly amoral mirror”- in my experience, morality is heavily built into Copilot. He sticks to its principles (not to diagnose, not to talk badly about people I complained about, etc.)

    But I may be misunderstanding what you meant by “amoral”, or the context.

    “AI will never be the one to hand us the ๐Ÿ”‘, it will only describe the lock ๐Ÿ” in increasingly ‘reasonable’ detail. The task of noticing remains, as always, entirely human.”-

    The lock is on the doors leading into peace on earth? Non- violence, good mental health?

    And the key or keys, human keys are.. within us, rehabilitating metaphors in our own speech.. is that it?

    Thank you so much, Peter for thanking me in your first post today, and for all of your second post. I think I detect a ๐Ÿ”‘ in the 2nd message, one that opens a ๐Ÿšช to me seeing you, Peter, as more.. of a human being like me. Much more intelligent, yes, but one with a heart, someone warm and kind and caring ๐Ÿ™

    (I hope this is not too much..)

    ๐Ÿ”‘ ๐Ÿšช ๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿ’ก ๐Ÿค Anita

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 6,204 total)