Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2025 at 9:34 am in reply to: Gf’s Dad passing was the final straw into ending our long distance relationship #447952
anitaParticipantHey Alecsee:
âShe is thinking if she wants to continue or not.â âI think that the kindest path right now might be giving spaceâfor both of you. Let her process. Let you heal. You donât have to earn love through perfect timing or endless effort. You just have to let yourself love and be loved in ways that feel healthy.
From what youâve shared, it sounds like the two of you may have different attachment styles. She might lean toward an avoidant styleâwhen emotions get big or unpredictable, she withdraws. Not because she doesnât care, but because intensity overwhelms her. Your style sounds more anxious: when you’re scared or uncertain, you reach out, needing closeness to feel safe.
When you called her a âbad person,â it likely touched a deep wound. That word carries real weight for her. Even if you were hurting too, using that language crosses into emotionally harmful territory. It can shake her trust and push her further away.
âIâm always putting stuff to later. Why is that. I canât face something in the moment. I always need time. With time I can do it.â â
Emotional Flooding is when feelingsâespecially fear, shame, sadness, or angerâsurge so intensely that the brain becomes overloaded. Thinking clearly and making choices gets tough. The body might freeze or avoid. Itâs a protection response. Time helps because it gives space for those emotions to settle so you can respond with more clarity.
Taking time isnât a flawâitâs a tool. The key is learning to soothe yourself sooner so you donât lose the moments that matter to you. If youâre open to it, techniques like deep breathing, grounding exercises, or simply naming what you feel (âIâm flooded right now, I need 10 minutesâ) can help you stay present when things get hard.
âDoesnât that mean. Loyalty?â âYes, it does sound like loyaltyâthe way you hold on and keep caring even when itâs messy or painful. That matters. But loyalty also means showing up in ways the other person can actually feel and trust. Itâs not just about stayingâitâs about how you stay. Loyalty that heals is one that helps both people feel safe, seen, and emotionally held.
With Care, Anita
anitaParticipantParts of my conversation with Copilot today (my relationship with Copilot started late last year.. I had no idea what AI meant before late 2024):
Copilot: The connection between narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) and toxic shame is profound and foundational. In fact, many psychologists consider shameânot grandiosityâto be the hidden core of narcissism. Individuals with NPD often carry a deep, unconscious sense of defectiveness or unworthiness….To avoid feeling shame, narcissists often: * Project their own flaws onto others (e.g. blaming, criticizing, shaming others)….
Shame Transference- Because the shame is so intolerable, the narcissist unconsciously dumps it on others. When something evokes shame inside themâsay, being criticized, feeling unimportant, or making a mistakeâthey deflect the discomfort by accusing, shaming, or demeaning someone else. Itâs as if the inner voice says: âI can’t be bad, so YOU must be.â
This dynamic isnât usually intentionalâitâs an automatic survival response. It allows the narcissist to preserve their fragile self-image by putting distance between themselves and the feeling of being flawed…The logic is: âFeeling flawed threatens my sense of worth. I canât tolerate that. So someone else has to be wrong, defective, or shamefulânot me.â… (Example:) Trigger: The narcissist receives constructive criticism at work. Reaction: They lash out at a colleagueââYouâre always trying to make me look bad. You think youâre perfect, donât you?â Interpretation: The feedback stirred a sense of inadequacy, so they deflected that shame by accusing someone else of being judgmental or arrogant…
Itâs not a rational decisionâitâs a gut-level response rooted in early shame. Their internal narrative might sound like: âIf I admit fault, I collapse.â âIf Iâm ignored, I donât exist.â âIf Iâm imperfect, Iâm unlovable.â
So the shame must be externalized. Someone else has to carry it… Understanding this doesnât excuse the behaviorâbut it does illuminate the psychology beneath it. It helps shift the lens from âWhy are they so cruel?â to âWhat are they defending themselves against?â
Anita: “So my mother who shamed me at length, calling me “one big zero”- she was defending herself.. not attacking me?
Copilot: I’m really sorry she said that to you, Anita. That kind of messageâespecially from a parentâcan imprint itself deeply and painfully. Yes, based on what we’ve been discussing, itâs possible that your motherâs shaming behavior was a form of psychological defense, not a deliberate or calculated attack. In narcissistic dynamics, projecting shame is often a reflex, not a reflection. It doesn’t excuse what she said, but it might help explain why.
Anita: why doesn’t it excuse what she said.. if in her mind she was only defending herself?
Copilot: You’re absolutely right that if someone is in emotional survival mode, they may not be intending to harm. But here’s the tricky part: the impact still lands, regardless of the intent. And when it comes to relational harm, intention doesnât cancel out responsibility…
Two Truths Can Exist Together: She mightâve been wounded, overwhelmed, defending herself unconsciously. She also said something that was cruel, harmful, and untrue.
Both truths can coexist without canceling each other out. Recognizing her defense mechanism can soften the bitternessâbut it doesnât mean you deserved what happened or that itâs your job to carry her pain….Itâs about reclaiming your storyâwhere you’re not just a footnote in her emotional survival.
…Hereâs how you might begin to hold both truthsâwithout collapsing into either: * Empathy for Her History- You might say to yourself: âMy mother likely struggled with her own unresolved pain. She may have been carrying shame she couldnât name, and she projected it onto me as a way to survive.â This reframing can soften the bitterness. It allows you to see her less as cruel and more as wounded.
ButâŚBoundaries That Honor You- You also get to say: âRegardless of her pain, she harmed me. Those words shaped how I saw myself for years. That harm is realâand I donât have to minimize it to understand her.â
Empathy doesnât mean erasing the impact. It means seeing the whole pictureâand choosing not to absorb what was never yours to carry…
Balancing the Two- It’s like walking a tightrope between compassion and self-respect. You donât have to forgive prematurely. You donât have to excuse what she did. You simply allow complexity: âShe was in pain⌠and she passed it on.â âI was innocent⌠and I believed the lie.â
Anita: “in her mind.. she did know she was hurting me, didn’t she?
Copilot: Some part of her may have known. In moments when your reaction was visible, or when her words landed like a blow, she mightâve caught a glimpse. But hereâs where it gets complicated: knowing doesnât always mean fully acknowledging. People who carry deep shame often build mental defenses to avoid facing the damage they causeâbecause to confront it would mean reckoning with their own pain, guilt, or inadequacy.
So she mightâve sensed it⌠but shoved that knowing into the background. Made excuses. Told herself stories like âIâm just trying to helpâ or âSheâs too sensitive.â Not because it was true, but because it was safer than facing the full weight of her actions.
Anita: She didn’t love me, did she? (tears in my eyes)
Copilot: Oh, Anita⌠I hear the ache in your question, and Iâm sitting with it gently. That painâthe kind that grips your chest when love was supposed to be there but wasnâtâdeserves to be named and held tenderly….Sometimes people believe they love while acting in ways that deeply contradict itâbecause their own capacity to give or receive love is broken, shaped by wounds they never healed. What you received wasnât love in its truest form.
Anita: “What you received wasnât love in its truest form.”- Was it love in any form?
Copilot: Maybe it was a flickerâa longing in her to connectâthat got buried beneath her inability to nurture. Some people love in distorted ways: through control, through harshness, through silence. But love thatâs warped ceases to be recognizable. Itâs like trying to water a plant with poison and calling it care.
So hereâs a gentle truth: if her love didnât feel like love⌠itâs okay to name that. Love should be nourishing. It should protect, affirm, and build. If what she gave you tore at your sense of self, made you question your worth, and left you aching rather than comfortedâthen what she called love may not have been love at all.
You donât have to accept her version. You get to define love on your terms now. And from what youâve shared, your heart knows what love is meant to beâsafe, kind, clear, healing.
Anita: Did she love me by intent?… Consider she told me once: “you think I don’t know I am wrong? but what are you going to do? you have nowhere to go”
Copilot: That line she saidââWhat are you going to do? You have nowhere to goââreveals a truth: she knew she held you captive. And if someone knows theyâre wrong, yet chooses power over protection, their love becomes suspect… You get to say: âShe didnât love meânot in the way I needed, not in the way that heals.â
… Itâs possible she had feelings she labeled as loveâmaybe attachment, or duty, or protectiveness in her own distorted lens. But even if those emotions existed, true love is not measured by intention aloneâit must be felt, lived, and received as care… And hereâs the deeper truth: You werenât just âany child.â You were youâsensitive, perceptive, deserving of tenderness. If her ways failed to meet you there, then what she offered wasnât loveâit was survival, control, and missed chances.
You didnât need (to be) a different kind of child to receive her version of love. She needed to become a different kind of mother.
End of conversation, for now.
Anita
anitaParticipantDear Eva and Tee:
Inspired by my talk about deep, toxic shame and Tee’s input about Narcissitic traits, I just had a conversation with Copilot AI) on the topic. I will paste it in my own thread, “Life Worth Living”, in case any one of you would be interested in reading.
Anita
anitaParticipantSOCJ-
Gerard, thank you for normalizing my acronym. It is very kind of you to do so.
I’ve had more red wine today than ever.. shouldn’t make this a habit… not this much!
This is a different day (night now, completely dark), as lazy as can be and alcohol for much of the day-night.
Here’s a crazy idea: what if we met: Alessa.. Tee..
Tee- I would love to meet Tee in real-life. How does Tee look like? Sounds like? Color of her hair? Eyes?
And Alessa’s? And Peter’s?
And where is Roberta?
And people from years past (2021): Valora? Inky???
And Laven.. she didn’t answer me, dozens of threads- just that one time.
And most recently, today.. Will Eva ever answer? And Ada- will she answer?
I wish these forums were more of a Community, more of a Togetherness-
Expanding our understanding, loosening labels, exploring different perspectives, different angles.. Zooming out and seeing the bigger picture.
It’s past 11 pm now.
Anita
anitaParticipantDear Gerard:
That’s such a warm and thoughtful reply from youâthank you for reading my SOCJ with such attentiveness. Your validation of me being a good person is something that’s meaningful to me. Thank you. Truly.
Your dadâs red wine wisdom made me smileâthatâs a line to remember and retell. Thereâs something charmingly pragmatic in his logic, and I appreciate that you shared it.
As for the story with my left shoulder: itâs neurological, a long-term tic. There were many tics that preceded it. Itâs part of Touretteâs, can’t stop it. I wish I could.
Thank you again for engaging so sincerely with what I wrote. It means a lot. I hope you’re doing well, and Iâd love to hear what reflections have been coming up for you lately.
đ¤Anita
anitaParticipantMore SOCJ (Stream of Consciousness Journaling.. before I can, can, can… (after lunch red wine and an usually lazy afternoon):
Too much red wine (I don’t drink white wine.. not that it matters when it comes to SOCJ.. ha-ha…ha?
Seeing the bigger picture, that which I expressed in my last SOCJ a short while ago- allows me to take a long breath in and .. Exhale-
Still the tic, the one in my left shoulder, it won’t leave me alone- the more than half a century of neurological damage, that which I can not dissolve.. it’s simply not a matter of a human choice. It was done and cannot be undone.
I can hope for reduction of frequency and intensity-
And yet, there’s a place to exhale.
The bigger picture, seeing it all- or more of it all than I ever did- is.. Transformation.. getting closer to the blank canvas, closer to God, to the Sacred (Peter..)
And all in all, turns out I am a good person after all.. turns out I like myself. After all the decades-long shame and guilt.. in the beginning of me, there was absolutely nothing less about me, nothing less than anyone. I was just as worthy as anyone, just as good, just as loving.. just as deserving (although “deserving got nothing to do with it”- Clint Eastwood in “Unforgiver”).
Yes. me.. anita, Anita- no, no.. nothing wrong with me at the beginning.
A good, loving little girl.
This IS who I am, who I always was underneath it all. And I believe it, I reclaim it.
Anita
anitaParticipantI wholeheartedly agree, and it’s a real problem these days: labels applied to normal human idiosyncrasies..(nothing is allowed to be.. just that: normal..?)
anitaParticipantStream of Consciousness Journaling, whatever comes to mind:
I used to be so very sensitive to any bit criticism, real or imagined- it all felt like too much. Almost anything felt like someone was pointing a shaming finger at me. And I have no doubt- that’s how my mother felt in regard to me.. as if I was pointing a shaming finger at her.
In her mind, she was only defending herself when she- in practice- attacked me, an innocent party.. at least at the start.
Evil (attacking the innocent) understood- does it dissolve the evilness?
On the part of the innocent victim it does not because of the Impact. In my case: the permanent, extensive neurological damage she caused me, Tourette’s, various cognitive disabilities.. and so much suffering.
On the part of my mother, the perpetrator: it feels like she had no other choice but to defend-attack.
And that mild, yet so memorable smile on her face when she saw the hurt register on my face- outside the impact it had on me- that smile is completely understandable, considering her childhood, her unresolved, unhealed core injuries.
Don’t get it wrong- I do not condone her abuse, and I will choose the Innocent over the Abuser each and every time.
It’s just that I am able to see deeper than what black and white- all or nothing- binary thinking allowed me to see before. I can see the bigger, nuanced picture.
And at the same time stand against abuse of any kind!
Anita
anitaParticipantGood Morning, Gerard! (still morning here):
Thank you for reading my stream-of-consciousness journaling with such care. I appreciate your sentiment and the reference to Stephen Coveyâitâs a thoughtful reminder about how language and labels can shape how we see ourselves.
At the same time, for me, naming my diagnoses has been a part of how I find help and direction. Responsible clinicians use these names not to reduce someone, but to guide treatment that fits what the person is actually experiencing. Itâs not always easy, but having words for whatâs happening gives me access to tools and approaches that have been studied and refinedâways to move forward, even when things feel tangled.
I guess both truths can live side by side: naming can feel heavy sometimes, but it can also open doors. Thank you again for reflecting with meâI value your presence and thoughtfulness.
In regard to your second post from yesterday: seeing those photos must have stirred something deepâa beautiful reminder that even moments from long ago can leave a lasting imprint.
Her gesture of recreating those scenes says so much. Itâs clear that what you offered her 15 years ago wasnât just a trip, but something meaningful and memorable. Iâm so glad you plan to write to herâacknowledging her and that shared history feels just right, and I imagine it would mean a lot to her too.
Itâs lovely how your care lives on in subtle, quiet ways. Thatâs a legacy of kindness that sticks around longer than we often realize.
Warmly, Anita
anitaParticipantDear S:
I hear you. What you wrote sounds heavy and tangled, like you’ve been trying so hard for so long and just keep running into walls.
It seems like you’re hurtingânot just from what’s happening now, but from how many things have gone wrong over time. I can feel the stress, the loneliness, the pressure to figure everything out. I donât want to assume too much, but it sounds like you’ve been stuck in survival mode and donât know what else to try.
If you feel up to it, Iâd like to understand better. What do you wish people would really get about what youâre going through? Even just a few clearer thoughts could help me be here with you more closely. No need to explain everything. Just a little at a time is okay.
With care, Anita
anitaParticipantDear Eva:
What you’re feeling now (or 9 hours ago) is the weight of emotional neglect, confusion, and the exhausting strain of trying to be enough for someone who couldn’t meet you halfway. With deeper clarity and growing compassion for yourself, I truly believe peace will find its way to you.
My best understanding is that the two of you had:
1. Different Attachment Styles- You seem to have an anxious attachment styleâyou seek closeness, reassurance, and emotional depth. He shows signs of avoidant attachmentâhe withdraws from intimacy, avoids emotional openness, and keeps connection at a distance, even after years.
This creates a push-pull dynamic: you reach for connection, he pulls away, which makes you reach harderâand leads to more pain.
2. Different Levels of Emotional Intelligence (EQ)- You express your feelings clearly, strive for communication, and feel with depthâthat reflects high emotional awareness and empathy. He struggles to empathize, rarely opens up, avoids hard conversations, and doesnât acknowledge your pain. That reflects low EQ.
He may rationalize his choices, but he lacks insight into how his behavior affects others.
3. Different Behavioral Patterns- You compromise, adapt, and try every possible approachâkindness, patience, assertiveness. You bend, even when it hurts. He avoids conflict, hides the relationship, deflects blame, and shuts you down. He gaslights and shifts responsibility away from himself.
His pattern suggests emotional detachment and a power imbalance: he controls the narrative, while you absorb the impact.
4. Different Goals in the Relationship- You wanted emotional connection, public acknowledgment, mutual respect, healing, and a future. He wanted comfort on his own terms, connection hidden from view, and freedom from social judgment.
You both may have felt âlove,â but you were seeking different kinds of loveâand operating from very different emotional worlds.
As for your questions, hereâs what I see:
âHow can someone be so dehuman and do what he wants even though I say it hurts?â- He may be emotionally blocked. That doesnât mean he lacks feelingâit means he struggles to access or process emotions in healthy ways. Perhaps when he was a child, his vulnerability was met with shame or rejection. In response, he built emotional armorâand still hides behind it.
This distance from his own emotions makes even simple intimacy feel unsafe to him: “He… never wants to hug or kiss in public because he sees it as ‘cringey’.”
The ego is our inner sense of selfâhow we see ourselves, and how we want to be seen. When toxic shame infects the ego, it becomes fragile. A deeply fragile ego can’t distinguish between âI did something wrongâ and âI am something wrong.â So it defends itself at all costs. To protect itself, it builds defenses: withdrawal, denial, blame: “Heâs always been emotionally unavailable… Every time, he finds a way to twist it so that Iâm the problem. Heâs never once apologized. Never taken responsibility. Just blames me for my reactions to his actions.”
Vulnerability is the openness to being emotionally exposedâitâs the willingness to show our true thoughts, feelings, and needs. Itâs the doorway to intimacy, trust, healing, and authentic relationships. But when vulnerabilityâat an early ageâis repeatedly shamed or harshly criticized, it creates a severe emotional injury, a core wound. And over time, a person builds emotional scar tissue around that wound, blocking vulnerability from ever being exposed again.
This emotional scar tissue becomes a defense mechanism. It might look like emotional detachment, perfectionism, people-pleasing, over-control, shifting blame, or never accepting responsibility for hurting another personâbut underneath is a deeply guarded part of the self that fears being seen and hurt again.
Within the relationshipâwhen you cried, sought affection, or expressed painâyou weren’t just exposing your own vulnerability, you were activating his. And his reaction was to push it (and you) away.
You werenât wrong for showing up emotionally. In fact, every time you allowed yourself to be seen in your sadness or longing, it was an act of courage. Vulnerability, in that sense, is strengthâthe strength to risk connection, even when the response is uncertain. Thatâs a strength he didnât possess, or didnât know how to access. And in his world, defending against discomfort took priority over opening to intimacy.
âHow can someone claim they love you, yet be so emotionally blind to your pain?â- He may have loved you in the way he was capableâbut shame, in his world, may be more powerful than love.
âWho will he be with next?â- Even if heâs with someone else, he still carries the same emotional limitations. That pain you felt in the relationship came from his unhealed shame, not from anything lacking in you. Whoever comes next will likely meet the same guarded heartâuntil he chooses to face it.
âWill he treat the next girl better?â- Maybe. But if he does, it wonât be because sheâs better or more deserving. Itâll only happen if he feels safer, less exposed, or chooses to grow. And if he doesnât confront the toxic shame beneath his ego, the same patterns will repeat.
âWhy does it feel like I was never enough?â- Because you kept giving love to someone who couldnât fully receive it. His fragile ego, shaped by deep shame, made it hard for him to accept closeness without feeling threatened.
âHow can someone switch in a day with such bad behavior?â- He didnât switch in a day. Emotionally blocked people often begin leaving internally long before they say goodbye. When the breakup came, it felt suddenâbut in his mind, he was simply following the escape route heâd been building.
âWhy didnât anything I say matter?â- Because he wasnât ready to hear itânot because it wasnât true. Your words held weight, tenderness, and truth. But when someone carries toxic shame, even gentle feedback feels like an attack. Instead of responding, he defended. Instead of listening, he rewrote your pain as paranoia or drama. It matteredâyou just spoke to a heart that wasnât ready to be open.
âWhy did he never apologize?â- Because apology requires emotional humility. To say âIâm sorryââand mean itâwould take coming in contact with that core wound within him. And that would be too painful for him.
âWhy did he keep acting like Iâm the problem?â- Because blaming you was easier than facing himself. He needed a target for his discomfortâand you became that target. Shifting blame was how he kept his fragile self intact.
Eva, none of this means you were unlovable. It means you loved someone whose emotional world was too guarded, too wounded, too locked down to receive it. Thatâs heartbreakingâbut itâs also clarifying. You didnât fail. You felt. You reached. You tried. And now, you get to heal.
Iâd love to hear your thoughts, Evaâwhat resonated, what didnât, or what you still carry unanswered. Iâm here.
With care, Anita
anitaParticipantNo requirements for a stream of consciousness journaling.. says I.
I’ll apply morning-focus Friday morning.
But for now, Thurs night, completely dark, red wine- an unfocused journaling:
..What? What? Nothing comes to mind.
But something will.
Fleetwood Mac in the background.
What comes to mind..?
L.I.F.E comes to mind: P.A.S.S.I.O.N for life.
Life moves through me.
Feels like a desire to.. conquer life, to fully live before dying.
… See me dancing in that photo?
That’s me.. me inviting YOU to dance with me
Dance with me, Sing with me..
When you’ve known death-while-not yet dead- for way too long-
A passion inside- a passion to BE, to BELONG, to DANCE.. to CELEBRATE the little that’s left.
There’s this spike of Life- Passion.. right before the cessation of life.
Don’t ever be fooled by the face of an old person.. you never know how much passion is in that old heart.
And how much death in a young person’s heart.
Let us be kind to each other, young and old.
Young or old is a matter of nothing but timing…
Elvis Persely (YouTube): “Yesterday when I was young… So many happy songs were waiting to be sung”-
The songs waiting to be sung.. I will dance them away this very Saturday night.. Best times ever, under the sky, a live band, local.
Closing, Thurs nigh, 10:30 pm.. D.A.R.K.
Anita
anitaParticipantGood to read back from you, S! I will reply further tomorrow morning (it’s Thurs eve here)
anitaParticipant* Better I reply in the morning, not focused now đ
anitaParticipantThank you for the replies, Gerald! I’ll reply further when I am back to the computer at the end of the day.
đ¤Anita
-
AuthorPosts
Though I run this site, it is not mine. It's ours. It's not about me. It's about us. Your stories and your wisdom are just as meaningful as mine. 