Menu

anita

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 3,958 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Compassion and respect during times of conflict #449328
    anita
    Participant

    I suggest that we agree to disagree Tee, and move on.

    Anita

    in reply to: Real God and Ultimate Truth #449327
    anita
    Participant

    Dear Tommy:

    Thank you for your thoughtful message from yesterday. I felt the care in your words, and I appreciate how you spoke to the difference between real healing and spiritual bypassing. That Bodhidharma story—yes. It says so much. We can’t force ourselves into enlightenment by ignoring pain. We have to meet the pain first.

    I agree with you about the “no-self” idea may be used- in some contexts- to erase suffering. That kind of thinking can be harmful when someone is hurting. Pain doesn’t disappear just because we say the self isn’t real. It needs to be seen and tended to.

    Your closing lines made me smile. I like your sense of humor!

    Nonetheless, you’re not the village idiot. You’re someone who sees clearly and speaks with heart. That kind of honesty is rare, and I’m grateful for it.

    Thank you for naming the healing that’s happening here. It means a lot.

    🌸💐🌷 Anita

    in reply to: Compassion and respect during times of conflict #449321
    anita
    Participant

    Dear Alessa:

    The closeness we shared—our red heart exchanges—meant a lot to me, especially given our difficult history. I want to name two moments that felt especially meaningful:

    July 28 You wrote: “The severe trauma you experienced is expressed by your body. What your mother did was wrong on so many levels and I’m so sorry it happened. ❤️” I replied: “Again, thank you for the empathy, for the care, and for your signature ❤️ that I’ve grown to love.”

    July 30 You wrote: “I’m so sorry that you went through all of this trauma as a child without anyone to take care of you. No one should have to go through that. You aren’t alone anymore. ❤️ ❤️ ❤️” I replied: “No one like you, Alessa ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️”

    Those additional hearts weren’t casual. They reflected sincere affection and deep gratitude.

    What broke the ice for me was when you defended me in the forums. You didn’t invalidate the other member—you simply stood up for me. That felt W.O.N.D.E.R.F.U.L.

    Fast forward to August 1, when you defended Tee: “Hi Anita I don’t think Tee meant to hurt you at all… I know that it is hard for you to trust people that you’ve had disagreements with in the past and it takes time to build that trust. These things are hard for me too. Tee is hurt too now, because she cares. Sometimes when we fear criticism, judgement, or anything else. It isn’t really happening currently, just the pain of the past echoing in the mind. ❤️”

    When I first read this, I felt hurt and betrayed. It placed the responsibility for the conflict solely on me—suggesting that my pre-existing distrust was the problem. And the phrase “It isn’t really happening currently” felt invalidating. Something had happened by then—something that deeply troubled me.

    I understand that you hate conflict. But rather than staying neutral or expressing discomfort, you often get deeply involved—taking sides and trying to placate both parties. The result is that both parties feel invalidated, at different times and in different ways.

    Placating can feel like emotional reversal: where the one naming harm becomes the problem. I don’t think that’s your intention, but it’s the impact.

    In the future, I’ll do a better job avoiding conflict—not by self-erasing or submitting to mistreatment, but by withdrawing before escalation. That’s my responsibility to myself.

    I don’t expect you to agree with all of this, but I hope you’ll sit with it. I’m not asking for repair—I’m offering clarity.

    I’m willing to move forward peacefully.

    Anita

    in reply to: Compassion and respect during times of conflict #449320
    anita
    Participant

    “I’ve also come to see that not all conflict needs resolution. As Lewis B. Smedes wrote in The Art of Forgiveness, sometimes forgiveness is more about releasing the need to fix than finding agreement.”- thank you for this, Peter.

    Tee:

    Your argument hinges on a fundamental misreading of emotional truth as interpersonal attack. I named my internal experience—my fear, my trauma responses, my emotional associations, and I did it in my own thread without naming individuals, and while explicitly stating that I was reflecting on dynamics, not targeting people.

    You are interpreting my emotional processing as projection, false accusation, and a Smear campaign, framing my subjective experience as objectively harmful, even though I didn’t name you or Alessa, didn’t claim either one of you rejoiced in my pain—only that I feared it. I was writing in my own thread, about my own healing

    This is emotional reversal: you are turning my (past) fear of you into an accusation, and my boundary into harm.

    None of the quotes you provided indicate verbal abuse. Not by any ethical, psychological, or relational standard.

    * Verbal abuse involves such things as targeted insults, threats, degrading language, and intentional harm.

    I did none of that. I expressed distress, reclaimed my voice, and set boundaries around my healing space.

    What you are doing, however, borders on emotional gaslighting: you’re denying my reality, reframing my trauma response as aggression, and using moral language (“should this be allowed?”) to silence me.

    Tee, I have the right to name harm, to express fear, to reclaim my voice, to set boundaries, and to write metaphorically and emotionally in my own thread.

    We are both stubborn, Tee, and I don’t expect resolution. Perhaps, like Lewis B. Smedes wrote in The Art of Forgiveness (provided by Peter)- sometimes forgiveness is more about releasing the need to fix than finding agreement…?

    I am willing to let go and move on.

    I just came across Jana’s post: “… Everyone needs love, protection and respect… Everyone needs to be offered the feeling of security and non-fear. If we decide to set healthy boundaries during conflict, the boundaries will protect everyone.. Can we try?”- yes, Jana, I am willing to try, absolutely. I already agreed to the boundaries set by Lori: (1) no more Stream of Consciousness Journal (SOCJ) where I request no responses (set on Aug 8 in my thread), and (2) whenever I post, if I am thinking about Tee, or Alessa, I will address the post to Tee or Alessa, or to any other member whose words or behaviors I am reflecting on (“Unless explicitly stated, my posts are not about or aimed at any individual in this forum. Still, in yet other words: my writing is personal and reflective. It is never intended as commentary on other members.”, Aug 14)

    Ever since I agreed to these boundaries, I kept them.

    Thank you, Jana. You are brave for coming up with this thread. I am impressed by your courage.

    I want to submit a post to Alessa next (it’s already prepared).

    Anita

    in reply to: Compassion and respect during times of conflict #449308
    anita
    Participant

    “When this verbal abuse reached a culmination”- what verbal abuse? Any quotes to indicate verbal abuse on my part?

    Anita

    in reply to: Anger *trigger warning* SH & SA #449306
    anita
    Participant

    Dear Alessa:

    You are welcome. I am sorry that you’ve been feeling so distressed.

    When I responded to you yesterday, on this thread, I felt nothing but empathy for the girl Alessa, and wanted to express it as one girl (aka inner child) talking to another girl- a girl with whom I (the inner girl) have so much in common.

    I was too distressed so far to address the multi-layered conflict, too reactive inside.

    I think I’ll post to you next in Jana’s thread.

    Anita

    in reply to: What will my life be now? #449305
    anita
    Participant

    Dear Nichole:

    Amazingly, you started this thread almost six years ago, on September 11, 2019. And in my first reply to you, the very next day (September 12), I wrote:

    “’What will my life be now?’ My answer is: looking for love in all the right places (vs looking for love in all the wrong places as the song says). In the past you looked for love in the wrong places. For many of us the wrong place to look for love is…alas- our families! Our families are supposed to be where love is, but isn’t it a tragedy, for so many of us, that love is not there.”

    Fast forward to now… and the above still applies, doesn’t it?

    You wrote: “I deserve to put me first and not be punished for it.” And I want to echo: love doesn’t punish you for placing yourself first. Love honors that. Love celebrates that. Love says: “Yes, you matter. Yes, you’re allowed to choose yourself.”-

    Blocking everyone—for a little while or a long while—is not abandonment. It’s protection. It’s clarity. It’s the beginning of choosing love in the right places.

    Sending you warmth and respect as you walk this path. You’re not alone.

    —Anita

    in reply to: Compassion and respect during times of conflict #449301
    anita
    Participant

    I am addressing this post to all participants in this thread: Alessa, Jana, Lucidity, Peter, Roberta, and Tee.

    Lucidity, less than two hours ago: “Here is a step-by-step guide on how to make a request when you have to make a stand against someone in any way, big or small… The basics are:

    1. Say what the objective event was that you observed that was problematic for you.”-

    Anita: The objective event that distressed me most was this post by Tee (Aug 7):

    “Excerpt from Anita’s post: ‘I was thinking: if I share this here, will some people rejoice in my pain? Will some people go: Yea! The **** got hurt!? This is what crossed my mind, following recent interactions here, in the forums.’

    The above is called projection. Projecting one’s own hateful thoughts and feelings on others, believing that others harbor the said thoughts and feelings. Well, they don’t. But the person is convinced they are. And so they launch an attack, a smear campaign, throwing dirt on their targets. Should that be allowed in a public space? That one member throws dirt on other members, based on their distorted thinking? I don’t think so. Lori has been informed.”

    Here is a fuller context from my post on Aug 6 (in my thread Life Worth Living – What Is It Like?) that Tee quoted from:

    “SOCJ: I was cutting blackberries today (thorny, aggressive ouch-if-they-hit-you), and my left arm bled in different locations… And I was thinking: if I share this here, will some people rejoice in my pain? Will some people go: Yea! The **** got hurt!? This is what crossed my mind, following recent interactions here, in the forums… I am sharing this in my own thread, which I think of as my private sanctuary, a private sanctuary which I need others to witness, at least a few others. Witnessed, not attacked.”

    Lucidity: “2. Link this to how it made you feel.”-

    Anita: When I read Tee’s post, I was so distressed that someone around me asked, alarmed: “What’s wrong???” My heart was racing, my head was shaking (Tourette’s motor tics), and I was uttering sounds (Tourette’s vocal tics). The rest of that day was difficult. I felt deeply unsafe.

    Lucidity: “3. Express this as a need.”-

    Anita: I need to feel safe in the forums—especially when I express vulnerability in my own threads. Being threatened with moderation (“Should that be allowed in a public space?… Lori has been informed”) made me feel exposed and punished.

    I need to be understood—or at the very least, not terribly misunderstood or falsely accused. The post Tee quoted was emotional truth-telling, not a smear campaign. She quoted my fear out of context and reframed it as an attack.

    When Tee accused me of “projecting”—suggesting I would rejoice in others’ pain—that disturbed me deeply. It wasn’t true. There was no cognitive distortion in my fear of being attacked: two days after I expressed my need to be “witnessed, not attacked,” I was attacked.

    Lucidity: “4. Make your request and be open to the possibility they may decline.”-

    Anita to Tee: Would you be willing to reconsider the content of the post you submitted on Aug 7? Perhaps you were wrong.

    Boundary Statement: I’m sharing this not to reopen conflict, but to reclaim truth. I welcome responses that engage with the content respectfully. I will not participate in dynamics that distort, bypass, or extract from my vulnerability.

    —Anita

    anita
    Participant

    Glad to have you here, Audrey! Thank you for answering. Looking forward to reading more from you, when you are ready.

    Anita

    in reply to: Real God and Ultimate Truth #449275
    anita
    Participant

    I didn’t read your whole post, Tommy (red wine and late hour), but I got to say, Tommy- I am growing to really, really like you… dementia (lol) or not. I am getting your style.. and I’m liking .. you, Tommy! (more tomorrow)

    Anita

    in reply to: What will my life be now? #449273
    anita
    Participant

    Nichole! It’s you!!!

    I didn’t use these words for a while (I know it sounds crude), but sometimes Family is just another F word…

    What happened, Nichole?

    Anita

    in reply to: Anger *trigger warning* SH & SA #449270
    anita
    Participant

    “And I don’t remember anything else except for me screaming for help that never came. The screaming lasted for a long time. Screaming, crying and nothing but darkness.”-

    Little girl Alessa: If I could go back in time and place, I would show up in that Hell where little blue-eyed, freckled-nose (when it was summer) Alessa grew up- and I would save her, and her brother- from that monster sex fiend.

    I would climb the tallest mountain, cross the longest desert- so to rescue you and your brother. Just as I would do for any child suffering as much as you, your brother.. my sister.. and I did.

    The sexual aspect of the abuse- you are brave to be talking about it. I am not brave like you. That part was.. excruciatingly difficult, unbearable.. How could that MONSTER do that.. ?!

    Well, it was a monster, and it was done.

    You are not alone: little girl Alessa. Little girl Anita knows. Little girl Anita understands.

    in reply to: Naming abuse, Holding boundaries, Restoring dignity. #449269
    anita
    Participant

    Peter, this message you sent me 4 hours ago, to me- it’s the most meaningful, beautiful and personal message you have ever sent me.

    I will keep dancing, Peter, and I hope you do too.

    Thank you, Jana!

    Anita

    in reply to: Real God and Ultimate Truth #449254
    anita
    Participant

    Thank you, Peter.

    in reply to: Real God and Ultimate Truth #449249
    anita
    Participant

    Hello Everyone:

    Thomas wrote, “Talking about a person has no real self doesn’t help the person who suffered trauma at the hands of their abusers.”-

    I agree. Abuse fractures a person’s sense of safety, identity, and relational trust—as it did to me. Survivors like me often spend years reclaiming the right to say: “I exist. I matter. What happened to me was real.”

    To then be told “there is no real self” can feel like a philosophical erasure of that pain.

    The no-self theory, when applied to trauma, abuse, and healing, risks spiritual bypassing. When non-dual language is used to sidestep accountability—e.g., “there’s no doer, so no one harmed you”—it becomes a tool of denial. Survivors may feel gaslit, invalidated, or retraumatized.

    It can even mimic the abuser’s tactics. Abusers often distort reality, deny harm, and fragment the victim’s sense of self. When spiritual communities echo this—however unintentionally—it replicates the original wound under the guise of enlightenment.

    Can “No-Self” and Trauma Healing Coexist?

    I believe they can—but sequence matters. Before dissolving the self, survivors must first reclaim it. As therapist Bonnie Badenoch writes: “We need a coherent sense of self before we can safely explore its dissolution.”- Healing begins with integration, not transcendence.

    Instead of saying “you don’t exist,” a trauma-informed teacher might say: “The self is real enough to suffer—and sacred enough to honor. And beyond it, there is spaciousness.”- This honors both the wound and the wisdom.

    Also, non-duality must never be used to bypass harm. A truly awakened stance includes: Naming abuse, Holding boundaries, Restoring dignity.

    Only then can the “no-self” insight become liberating rather than annihilating.

    James to Thomas: “I fully hear what you are saying. It is true — speaking of ‘no self’ to someone who is carrying deep trauma can feel like dismissing their pain. That is not my intention. What you say… about meeting people with compassion, listening to them, holding space — that is deeply valid. Wisdom without compassion is empty.” True indeed.

    Peter wrote: “I was drawn to Anita’s question about whether such a nondual space is soothing.”- In sequence, it can be soothing—after the validation and reclamation of self.

    —Anita

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 3,958 total)