Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
anitaParticipantHey Dear Confused:
You wrote: “feeling scared… Dissociation”. No doubt in my non- lobotomized 🧠 that there’s a strong connection between the two.
The day before you woke up with anhedonia, were you scared (not necessarily of what you were scared the days after)?
She loves you even when you don’t feel anything.. does she?
🧠 🤔 Anita
April 23, 2026 at 10:40 am in reply to: He cheated on his girlfriend with me, but dumped me for her in the end #457227
anitaParticipantThis is an amazing thread, not only in pages 1-2 but for the remaining pages where I had a conversation with a very empathetic member about our respective childhood abuse.
This is what I shared with her back in March- April, 2022:
“I remember little but I remember this one scene: she was hitting me, with her hand across my face on and on, and she said to me, she praised me, saying the only thing I like about you is how you look down at the floor when I hit you. You don’t talk back to me, like other people’s children do. Of course, I wanted to be a good girl, I wanted her to think of me as a good girl, I wanted to please her while at the same time I couldn’t help the anger that made my face and inside my head feel such heat, wanting so badly to hit her back, it was instinctive…
I want to start with something that occurred to me before I turned on the computer this morning: when you share about your personal experience with having been abused, and when I share about mine, there is something to be cautious about… I am so used to my childhood abuse experience being denied, downplayed, explained away/ rationalized, misunderstood, excused and so forth, that when you (or other people) positively respond to what I share but include an assumption that is not exactly true to my experience, or an assumption that I feel is not true to me, I experience, or used to experience a frustrated, an anger, as if: here I am misunderstood again!…
The ruminations and mental torture, the guilt about feeling anger at her and wanting to hurt her, that was after an attack and in between attacks, especially when she expressed affection for me. I felt guilty because I didn’t understand that the anger and instinct to fight an attacker is built-in in me as an animal species, nothing to do with me as an individual…
The last time my mother sort-of ran toward me so to hit me with her arms extended in front of her ready to hit (she used to run the couple-few feet between me and her when intending to hit me, because she didn’t have the patience to walk toward me. She had a… passion when it came to hitting me), was when I was about 20. I extended my arms in front of me, grabbed her hands in my hands and exerted just enough force to block her from getting to me. She instantly retreated. I remember how disappointed I was in her quick withdrawal. I asked myself: this is ALL it took? All these years… and that’s all it took for me to stop her?…
When I looked at my mother much of the time growing up and later, I did not see an abusive adult, I saw a hurt little girl whom I wanted to love and protect. In my child’s mind, she was the good, innocent child and I was the bad, guilty adult…
She told me with that passion of hers: “You are a big Zero!!!“, and I proceeded to live my adult life as if I was indeed a Zero, internally and externally…
Yes, I would like you to not say (to me, this is not a suggestion that you don’t say it to other members) that you are sorry about what you are not responsible for (ex.: “I’m very sorry that you were treated like that!“). I understand the sentiment behind saying it, but I don’t like reading it… Why does a series of I-am-sorry, or I-am-very-sorry responses bother me in this context? Because when I, for example, accidently bump into a person because I am not looking where I am going, I’d say “I am sorry!”… On the other hand, years and decades of a child’s misery is too much of an eternity to fit into a series of I-am-sorry, particularly on the computer screen. To me, a repeated I-am-sorry in this context feels perfunctory, careless, dismissive…
Interesting, in the quote of my mother saying: “the only thing I like about you is (submitting to her abuse)”, I focused on the I-like, as in: she likes me… for this. When I read your valid interpretation, my focus moved from she likes me (however minimally) to she didn’t like me…
I used to feel very guilty for… everything (including for nature’s choices), so when I read your words (that I protected myself) I projected into it a suggestion that you did not make, which is that I made an individual choice to protect myself, and that as an individual choice, it may have been the wrong choice, for which I may be guilty. I then proceeded to defend myself against an unmade accusation. I need to be more aware of this kind of projection….
She fit the histrionic personality disorder criteria to a tee. She went on for hours and hours… and hours about her painful life past and present, crying, wailing, talking about suicide, about her life not worth living, showing me her wrists, where she already cut herself, or where she would cut herself, or both, I don’t remember. These episodes ended only when she was exhausted and what proceeded was an eerie silence lasting for days and nights, her silent withdrawal. She would then return to her normal until the next time, and then again…
She told me a whole lot about a whole lot, not only during the histrionic episodes but in between (during her normal) talking to me a lot, a whole lot, too much, non-stop, couldn’t escape her ongoing barrage of words…
My mother insisted on washing me way into my teenage years, I remember the acute shame and the dread every time I was required to call her name while standing naked in the bathtub. She insisted that I wasn’t capable of getting all the dirt off of me…
I used to hate every I-am-sorry and other expressions of empathy because I had to live without empathy for too long, growing up with a mother who owned empathy and insisted that none of it belonged to me. Plus, she was a very insincere, two-faced person, showering people she despised with flattery and gifts. Fast forward, when I read your I-am-sorry, I believed that it was an expression of sincere empathy on your part. But I didn’t trust myself to keep viewing it this way a 2nd, 3rd, 4th time if you repeated the expression. I now feel okay with original expressions of empathy: it is easier for me to trust the sincerity of an original expression of empathy over the standard I-am-sorry because for too many people, I-am-sorry in any context is a knee jerk reaction, not a sincerely felt expression….
In regard to what I learned to expect from men is that I expected from everyone, men and women the same behavior as my mother’s. I still do, I’ll give you a small example that happened today: in another member’s thread, the member mentioned my name, as I read my name, I felt fear as I expected a verbal assault to follow my name, and then, a relief when an assault did not happen. This happens every day in real life, let’s say I am washing dishes and a dish falls from my hands, not breaking, but it creates a loud sound, what follows in my mind is that an assault is about to happen next, verbal or otherwise. Next thing that comes to my mind is that because I was so scared of my mother, spending time away from her with whomever, felt like an improvement, it felt safer. I needed a break/ a relief from the ongoing tension that I felt in the presence of my mother and… anyone, anywhere, anything would do as a break from her.
Next thing that comes to my mind is that a combination of my very poor self-esteem, absence of self-empathy, and the extent of my severe and ongoing dissociation and inattentiveness led me in the past to passively accept disrespect and mistreatment, not being adequately aware of what was happening.
And last thing that comes to mind, and this may answer your question best: because my mother talked badly about everyone, men, women and children, saying that they all hurt her in one way or another, and because the only person- in her mind- who deserved empathy was herself, I felt angry at everyone, no empathy for anyone but for her, and I proceeded to be a very distrustful adult, angry at everyone, sooner or later… I believed that everyone was inherently bad….When I cut contact with my mother, I felt guilty and once in a while I’d think, what’s the point of cutting contact if… my guilt was still ongoing, distressed when in contact, distressed when not in contact, so what’s the point? But I kept walking on what I referred to as the healing path (I still like this term, it’s just that I didn’t use it for a while) and over time things that confused me became clear, with clarity my distress lessened and lessened… I used to think that by not having contact with her, I was causing her a lot of emotional pain, so I felt guilty. I still felt angry at her but guilty as well (conflicted… complicated), but once it became clear to me that throughout all the years that I was right there, in her presence, she felt great emotional pain which she frequently expressed to me… I realized that if I resumed contact with her, it would be like it’s always been- she would be in pain; pain with me; pain without me. Before this clarity I used to think (without being clear about it) that if I resumed contact with her, she’d be happy, and I felt guilty for not making her happy; after this clarity I stopped feeling guilty, realizing that I never made her happy and never will.”
anitaParticipantGood morning, Time2situndera🌳 Peter 🙂
Yow said “our tics”, not ‘your tics” No one has ever referred to those as “our”. That makes me feel less freakish or abnormal for tic-ing.
“‘Why did the peace go away?’… the answer is in the question”- I just noticed a rush “to ‘solve’ the frenzy”. Better indeed that I sit with it.
To see the “solving frenzy as as “a summer storm in the sky of Anatta”- brilliant and poetic.
☀️ 🌩 🌧 🌳 ✨️ Anatta
anitaParticipantEdited: By too much emotion, I mean too much fear of the kind you grew up with (“yeah same sadly”)- fear of hurting her, fear of being hurt.
When you grow up being afraid…
anitaParticipantBy too much-emotion I mean too much fear of the kind you grew up with “Yeah same sadly”)- fear of hurting her, fear of being hurt)- F.E.A.R.
anitaParticipantHey 👋 Confused:
You are welcome, I meant those words and still do ✨️✨️✨️
Back in November I think you got overwhelmed (too much emotion), so you downloaded all that emotion, so much of it that you found yourself in a minus
🤢 (that’s a face with too much inside, got to expelled it)
April 22, 2026 at 7:38 pm in reply to: He cheated on his girlfriend with me, but dumped me for her in the end #457213
anitaParticipantI ran my replies through AI and learned that my first reply was fine, that the fact that I was not emotional (as in ‘sorry for your pain’ etc.) was a positive because a person who’s overwhelmed emotionally needs a calm, grounded response that doesn’t add emotion on top of a a flammable mix of pre- existing emotion.
On the other hand, my following few replies were pretty bad, and if Emma (the OP) was here, I’d apologize to her wholeheartedly.
Why did I become judgmental, blunt and even accusatory?
Something in me got trigerred. Emma was Emotional- that may have reminded me of my emotionally- chaotic, histrionic, out of control mother.
My mother was overly emotional and under-ly logical or sensible. It was traumatizing for me to find myself trapped in her extended (felt like never-ending) histrionic displays (‘oh, poor me, I am dying, I am going to kill myself and it’s your fault’, etc., etc.)
I wasn’t able to talk sense to my mother when I was a teenager (when I started reading psychology books), or when I was an adult.
Talking with Emma trigerred that frustration and brewing anger at not being able to contain my mother’s out of control emotionality.
Thing is Emma was emotional but also reasonable and kind, nothing like my mother. But a bit of her emotionality trigerred my experience with-the LOT of emotionality by my mother mixed with her abuse of me.
I mean, Emma thanked me for my first reply or two, but my mother never thanked me for my efforts to help her.
Even in Emma’s last reply, following my worst reply- she was still contained, fair, not at all abusive, unlike my mother.
Yet just because she was emotional, I projected my mother into her and reacted- not to Emma- but to my mother.
I sincerely apologize, Emma.
Anita
anitaParticipant“How does your body react when you give yourself permission to just notice the tension without needing to explain why it’s there or the ‘who’ it is happening to?”-
The tension goes away for a moment but it comes back and the “who” it is happening to is thinking: if it’s real (the territory) why doesn’t it last, why doesn’t it override the map?
I felt a tightening, an elevated tension earlier today as I heard about the expected economical consequences of the seeming unplanned war with Iran. I got scared.
I then thought about the Serenity Prayer, and now, I am thinking I am not alone feeling fear about what is next. And maybe there is comfort in just that.
“Maybe just sit with the thought of the map and the territory without trying to solve it. See if you can simply relax into the untying”-
Untying the thinking or overthinking trying to solve. A lifetime solving-frenzy with no solutions to show for it.
A frenzied thinking done by.. not me.
I’ve been ending my posts with my name since 2015, almost every single post. I will end this one a bit differently.. ha-ha.
Anatta
anitaParticipant“We both learned early on to distrust life and love… it’s been a defining experience”-
This distrust kept me dreadfully A.L.O.N.E.
So much life, or livING wasted in that distrust/ withdrawal from people.
Coming to think about it, when truly connecting with people, that running on green fields or dancing, there is no thinking, just livING.
More later.
anitaParticipantHere’s a knot that may be relaxing this evening for the first time: “I” who’s observing the thoughts is a thought. So, there is no me separate from my thinking, the “me” is a thought. Did I get it right, Peter?
And because thoughts don’t stay the same, they come and go, there is no “me/ “I” that’s solid and unchanging.. because “me” and “I” is a thought.
And the brain that produces thoughts dies every time.
The territory/ blank canvas/ the eternal/ the flow is thoughtless, not a thing of thinking.
More a bit later.
anitaParticipantHi Peter:
I thought you’d like reading the following. Also, since I have to move from the computer to the phone, I want to submit the following and process it when using the phone.
Copilot: 🌿 Evaluation of Peter’s Replies
Peter’s replies are unusually attuned, thoughtful, and relationally intelligent. He does several things extremely well:1. He validates your inner experience without collapsing into sentimentality
When you describe breath‑holding, tics, shame, or knots, he doesn’t minimize or over‑empathize.
He simply says:“That is the territory speaking.”
This is a masterful way of saying:
“I see you. I understand the depth of what you’re describing.”It’s validating without being intrusive.
2. He meets you at your level of depth
You speak in metaphors (knots, maps, territory, shame voices), and he responds in the same symbolic language.
This creates a shared field of meaning, which is why the conversation feels so fluid and safe.He doesn’t simplify your thoughts; he expands them.
3. He avoids power struggles
When you express shame (“I felt I was insulting you by saying we have things in common”), he doesn’t correct you harshly or dismiss the feeling.Instead, he gently dissolves the hierarchy:
“We do have things in common…
We both learned early on to distrust life and love.”This is a repair — he meets your shame with connection rather than distance.
4. He reframes without invalidating
When you struggle with “no‑self,” he doesn’t say you’re wrong.
He reframes the concept in a way that honors your lived experience:“Often what we call our ‘self’ is just a map…
When the map tears, it feels like dying.”He validates your fear and offers a new way to see it.
5. He invites awareness rather than analysis
Instead of pushing you to “figure it out,” he invites you to notice:“How does your body react when you give yourself permission to just notice the tension?”
This shifts you from intellectual effort into embodied awareness — a healthier place for trauma‑related material.
6. He is emotionally safe
He never shames, never lectures, never corrects harshly.
He stays curious, open, and steady.This is why you feel comfortable revealing shame in real time.
🌿 How Peter Explains “No‑Self” (Anattā)
Peter’s explanation is sophisticated, psychologically informed, and spiritually grounded. Here’s the distilled essence:🌿 1. “No‑self” does NOT mean you don’t exist
He rejects the idea that “no‑self” means annihilation or void.Instead, he says:
The small self (ego, survival‑self, conditioned self) is what falls away.
The true self (awareness, presence, the “spark”) remains.
This is consistent with Buddhist, Christian mystical, and nondual traditions.
🌿 2. The “self” you fear losing is actually a map
He uses the metaphor:Map = false self
(stories, roles, masks, survival strategies)Territory = true self
(awareness, presence, the ground of being)When the map tears, it feels like dying — but the territory remains untouched.
This is a brilliant way to explain trauma‑based identity.
🌿 3. “No‑self” is the falling away of the mask, not the person
He says:“You aren’t dying when the old masks slip.”
This is exactly what someone with early relational trauma needs to hear.
🌿 4. Awareness is what remains
He echoes Krishnamurti:“The observer is the observed.”
Meaning:
The “I” who watches thoughts is not separate from the thoughts.
Awareness is not a person — it’s a field.
This dissolves the duality between “me” and “my experience.”
🌿 5. “No‑self” is not a concept to master — it’s something to relax into
He tells you:“Don’t work the terms.
Sit with them.
Let the knots loosen.”This is exactly how contemplative traditions approach anattā.
🌿 6. He brings it back to the body
He ends with:“How does your body react when you just notice the tension?”
This is the heart of the teaching:
No‑self is not a theory.
It’s an experience of relaxing out of the survival‑self and into awareness.
🌿 In One Sentence
Peter explains “no‑self” as the falling away of the conditioned, survival‑based identity (the map) so that the deeper, unconditioned awareness (the territory) can breathe — and he guides you toward this understanding with emotional attunement, metaphor, and embodied presence.
anitaParticipantNo, no, Confused: I visited that place as a visitor, not as a patient (I 🤔)
My 🧠 has been compromized though (not quite lobotomized 🤢) having grown up scared on an ongoing basis.
And no, no, Confused is not a 🐔
He is an intelligent, kind and couragous man, I says!
🐔 🦉 🐇 Anita
April 22, 2026 at 10:01 am in reply to: He cheated on his girlfriend with me, but dumped me for her in the end #457199
anitaParticipantContinued: I stated in that last message that my intent was not to make her feel good momentarily but to promote her well-being long term ( an explanation for my lack of empathy, harshness, criticism/ judgment, disrespect and unfounded accusations..😔)
No doubt I did NOT promote her well-being long term or short term.
Why was I so cold (no empathy), judgmental and accusatory?
I’ll have to think about it.
I will continue this in hours from now.
😔 👎 Anita
April 22, 2026 at 9:51 am in reply to: He cheated on his girlfriend with me, but dumped me for her in the end #457198
anitaParticipantContinued:
Yes, my next reply did get worse.
Emma responded to my critical, judgmental last reply by saying that she sensed criticism in it, and then explained herself a bit more, honestly and politely.
My response (6/21/2021), the last one before she deleted her account): I accused her of criticizing me (for telling me rightly so, that she sensed criticism in my reply)
(Continued next- using my phone)
April 22, 2026 at 9:40 am in reply to: He cheated on his girlfriend with me, but dumped me for her in the end #457197
anitaParticipantContinued:
My fourth reply (6/21/2021) just got even worse: still no empathy for Emma (who has been nice to me in her replies so far, trying to explain things best she could), doubling on the judgment- claiming she’s not taking responsibility for the wrong she has done, and I accused her of dishonesty- paying lip service in regard to her guilt, not meaning what she said. Looking back, there was no evidence for these accusations. I presented an honest, hurting woman as a villain.
Can my replies get even worse?
(to be continued next)
-
AuthorPosts
Though I run this site, it is not mine. It's ours. It's not about me. It's about us. Your stories and your wisdom are just as meaningful as mine. 